The Applicability of Existing Typical Liquefaction Evaluation Methods of Site Soils Based on Shear Wave Velocities for Bachu Earthquake

Article Preview

Abstract:

Based on liquefaction survey of 2003 Xinjiang Bachu earthquake of Ms6.8 and in-situ shear wave velocity testing data, the feasibility and applicability of five typical liquefaction evaluation methods which use shear wave velocities as criteria are presented herein. Analysis showed that none of the five liquefaction evaluation methods can provide a satisfactory result in Bachu area. The successful judging rates are only 36% to 64%. The intensity method which is employed to evaluate liquefied and non-liquefied sites in Bachu area provides only 40% successful judging rate, and the method is risky in intensity VII area and conservative in intensity IX area. The critical lines of the five methods deviate greatly from the actual lines. In intensity VII area all the five methods incorrectly misjudge. Further work has to be conducted to research on the soil properties in Bachu area and to establish the regional liquefaction evaluation method in Xinjiang.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1412-1418

Citation:

Online since:

September 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Seed H. B. Soil liquefaction and cyclic mobility evaluation for level ground during earthquakes [J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, 1979, 105(GT2): 201-255.

DOI: 10.1061/ajgeb6.0000768

Google Scholar

[2] Seed, H. B., and Idriss, I. M. (1982). Ground motions and soil liquefaction during earthquakes, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Berkeley, Calif.

Google Scholar

[3] Seed, H. B., Tokimatsu, K., Harder, L. F., and Chung, R. M. (1985). ''The influence of SPT procedures in soil liquefaction resistance evaluations.'' J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 111(12), 1425–1445.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9410(1985)111:12(1425)

Google Scholar

[4] Youd T.L., and Idriss I.M. Proceedings of the NCEER Workshop on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils [R]. NCEER Technical Report, 1997, NCEER-97-0022, Buffalo, NY.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1090-0241(2001)127:4(297)

Google Scholar

[5] Seed R.B, Cetin K.O. et al. Recent Advances in Soil Liquefaction Engineering, A Unified and Consistent Framework[R]. EERC,USA:Earthquake Engineering Research Center,2003.

Google Scholar

[6] Andrus R.D. and Stokoe K.H.II. Liquefaction resistance of soils from shear-wave velocity[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenviromental Engineering, ASCE, 2000, 126(11): 1015-1025.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1090-0241(2000)126:11(1015)

Google Scholar

[7] Brady Ray Cox, M.S. Development of a Direct Test Method for Dynamically Assessing the Liquefaction Resistance of Soils in Situ[D]. 2006,The University of Texas at Austin, PhD dissertation.

Google Scholar

[8] Youd T L,Idriss I M. Liquefaction Resistance of Soils:Summary Report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF Workshops on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironment Engineering, 2001, 127(4): 297-313.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1090-0241(2001)127:4(297)

Google Scholar

[9] Dobry, R., Stokoe, K. H., II, Ladd, R. S., and Youd, T. L. (1981). ''Liquefaction susceptibility from S-wave velocity,'' Proc., ASCE Nat. Convention, In Situ Tests to Evaluate Liquefaction Susceptibility, ASCE, New York.

Google Scholar

[10] Robertson, P. K., and Campanella, R. G. (1985). ''Liquefaction potential of sands using the CPT.'' J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 111(3), 384–403.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9410(1985)111:3(384)

Google Scholar

[11] Robertson, P. K., Woeller, D. J., and Finn, W. D. L. (1992). ''Seismic cone penetration test for evaluating liquefaction potential under cyclic loading.'' Can. Geotech. J., Ottawa, 29, 686–695.

DOI: 10.1139/t92-075

Google Scholar

[12] Stokoe, K. H., II, Lee, S. H. H., and Knox, D. P. (1985). ''Shear moduli measurements under true triaxial stresses.'' Proc., Adv. in the Art of Testing Soil Under Cyclic Conditions, ASCE, New York, 166–185.

Google Scholar

[13] Tokimatsu, K., and Uchida, A. (1990). ''Correlation between liquefaction resistance and shear wave velocity.'' Soils and Found., Tokyo, 30(2), 33–42.

DOI: 10.3208/sandf1972.30.2_33

Google Scholar

[14] Liao, S., and Whitman, R. V. (1986a). ''Overburden correction factors for SPT in sand.'' J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 112(3), 373–377.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9410(1986)112:3(373)

Google Scholar

[15] Sykora D. W. Creation of A Data Base of Seismic Shear Wave Velocities for Correlation Analysis[R]. Geotech. Lab. Misc. Paper 1987, GL-87-26, U.S. Army Engr. Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Miss.

Google Scholar

[16] Chen Guoxing, Zhang Kexu and Xie Junfei,(1996). "Methods of liquefaction potential with shear wave velocity as a field index and the Adaptability." Journal of Harbin university of Architecture and Engineering, Harbin 29(1),97-103.(in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[17] Shi Zhaoji, Yu Shousong, Feng Wanling. Shear Wave velocity based Soil liquefaction Evaluation[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1993, 15(1):74-80.(in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[18] The National Standards Compilation Group of People¢s Republic of China. GB0011–2001 Code for seismic design of buildings[S]. Beijing:China Architecture and Building Press,2001. (in Chinese)

Google Scholar