Influence of Anisotropic Rock on Tunnel Stability with Consideration of Fluid-Solid Coupling

Article Preview

Abstract:

In general, rock mass is anisotropic because of presence of stratification, foliation or joints in it. In this paper we considered how the angle of anisotropy influences the stability of tunnel. By using COMSOL Multiphysics, fluid and 2D plane models are coupled to analyze stress-strain state, failure shape and water flow characteristic around tunnel for angle range from 0° to 90° with a interval of 15°. Results show that in condition of vertical force of initial stress field larger than horizontal one, failure district is maximum for θ=40° and minimum for θ=90° where the strength of horizontal direction in anisotropic rock is smaller than the vertical one. In this case failure is mainly developed in roof and bottom. When the horizontal strength of anisotropic rock is larger than the vertical, results reverse. In anisotropic rock, the more the direction of larger permeability is coincident with one of source underground water acted, the more water flows into tunnel.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

2101-2107

Citation:

Online since:

September 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] M.M. Schwartz: Composite material handbook, New York, MeGraw-Hill (1984)

Google Scholar

[2] COMSOL A B: COMSOL multiphysics version 3.2[M], Stockholm.[s.n] (2005)

Google Scholar

[3] S.G. Lekhnitskii: Theory of elasticity of an anisotropic body, Mir Publisher, Mosow (1981)

Google Scholar

[4] J.Liu, P.Han and A.Nakayama: Proceedings of the international symposium on geomechanics and geotechnics: From to Macro, shanghai, china vol.1 (2010), pp.415-420

Google Scholar

[5] D.Liu and Z.Tan: Proceedings of the international symposium on geomechanics and geotechnics: From to Macro, shanghai, china vol.2 (2010), pp.905-912

Google Scholar

[6] J.P. Carter and J.R. Booker: Proceeding of the international symposium ACMIAME, china (1993), pp.25-33

Google Scholar

[7] M.Lespinasse, J.Sausse: Quantification of fluid flow: hydro-mechanical behavior of different natural rough fractures, Journal of Geochemical Exploration Vol.69-70 (2000), pp.483-486.

DOI: 10.1016/s0375-6742(00)00111-4

Google Scholar

[8] A.P. Oron, B.Berkowitz: Flow in rock fractures, Water Resources Research Vol.34 (1998), pp.2811-2825.

DOI: 10.1029/98wr02285

Google Scholar

[9] Z.Wen G.H. Huang and H.H. Zhan: A numerical solution for non-Darcian flow to a well in a confined aquifer using the power law function, Journal of Hydrology Vol.364 (2009), pp.99-106

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.10.009

Google Scholar

[10] Y.F.Lu and J.F. Shao: Modeling of anisotropic damage in brittle rock under compression dominated stress[J], Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech. Vol.26 (2002), pp.230-247

DOI: 10.1002/nag.230

Google Scholar

[11] J.J. Liao and B.Acamei: Surface loading of anisotropic rock masses, Journal of Geotechnical Engineering ASCE Vol.17 (1991) pp.1779-1800

Google Scholar

[12] Y.J. Cui, A.M. Tang, C.Loiseau and P.Delage: Proceedings of the international symposium on geomechanics and geotechnics: From to Macro, shanghai, china vol.1 (2010), pp.23-28

Google Scholar