Comparative Analysis of Genetic Algorithms and Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithms for Optimal Reservoir Operation

Article Preview

Abstract:

Apart from traditional optimization techniques, modern heuristic optimization techniques, like genetic algorithms (GA), particle swarm optimization algorithm (PSO) have been widely used to solve optimization problems. This paper deals with comparative analysis of GA and PSO and their applications in a reservoir operation problem. Extensive component analysis, parameter sensitivity analysis of GA and PSO show that both GA and PSO can be used for optimal reservoir operation, but they display different features. GA can obtain very high approximate global optimal solutions of the problem with a high stability and a high computing efficiency, but it can’t obtain the problem’s accurate global optimal solutions. For GA, population size and mutation rate are two main parameters affect its solution qualities. Comparative to GA, PSO can obtain the accurate global optimal solutions of the problem with a higher computing efficiency, but with a less stability. For PSO, population size and velocity parameter are two main parameters affect its solution qualities.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

2727-2733

Citation:

Online since:

September 2011

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] J.H. Holland: Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems (MIT Press, Cambridge 1975).

Google Scholar

[2] R. Oliveria and D.P. Loucks: submitted to Water Resources Research, Vol.33 (1997).

Google Scholar

[3] R.Wardlaw and M. Sharif: submitted to Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, Vol.125 (1999).

Google Scholar

[4] W.C. Huang, L.C. Yuan and C.M. Lee: submitted to Water Resources Research, Vol. 33 (2002).

Google Scholar

[5] S. Momtahen and A.B. Dariane: submitted to Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management , Vol. 133 (2007).

Google Scholar

[6] C.T. Cheng, W.C. Wang, D.M. Xu and K.W. Chau: submitted to Water Resources Management, Vol. 22 (2008).

Google Scholar

[7] J. Kennedy and R.C. Eberhart: submitted to Proceedings of the IEEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, Perth, Australia (1995).

Google Scholar

[8] D.N. Kumar and M.J. Reddy: submitted to Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, Vol.133 (2007).

Google Scholar

[9] M. J. Reddy and D. N. Kumar: submitted to Hydrological Sciences Journal, Vol. 52 (2007).

Google Scholar

[10] K. K. Mandal, M. Basu and N. Chakraborty: submitted to Applied Soft Computing, Vol. 8 (2008).

Google Scholar

[11] M. H. Afshar and H. Mohammad: submitted to Proceedings of the Institue of Civil Engineering-Water Management, Vol.162 (2009).

Google Scholar

[12] A. M. Moradi and A. B. Dariane: submitted to 2009 IEEE International Advance Computing Conference, IACC (2009).

Google Scholar

[13] J. Chang, F. Wan, Q. Huang, W. Yuan and Y. Wang: submitted to International Journal of Modelling, Identification and Control (IJMIC), Vol. 8 (2009).

Google Scholar

[14] A. Vasan, Raju and K. Srinivasa: submitted to Applied Soft Computing, Vol.9 (2009).

Google Scholar

[15] D.E. Goldberg and K. Deb, In: Foundations of Genetic Algorithms, edited by G. J. E. Rawlins / Morgan Kaufman Publishers (1989).

Google Scholar

[16] G.Rudolph: submitted to IEEE Trans on Neural Networks, Vol. 5 (1994).

Google Scholar

[17] R.L. Haupt and S.E. Haupt: Practical Genetic Algorithms (Willy-InterScience 2004).

Google Scholar