Effect of Complex Initial Stress Conditions on Dynamic Deformation Behaviors of Compacted Loess

Article Preview

Abstract:

In practical projects, foundations or roadbeds soil is usually in complex initial stress states, and deformation and settlement may happen caused by earthquakes or other dynamic loadings. Since conventional laboratory soil test cannot authentically reproduce dynamic behaviors of soils under complex initial consolidation stress conditions, dynamic deformation behaviors of compacted loess is conducted under complex initial stress conditions through remodeled DTC-199 torsional cyclic load triaxial apparatus. The paper systematically investigated the effects of different initial stress state, such as average principal stress p0 , the angle of initial principal stress α0 and the initial intermediate principal stress coefficient b0, etc. on dynamic shear modulus Gd and damping ratio λ. Results show that: (1) To the same γd , Gd increases with the increase of p0 but the α0 and b0 have no influence on Gd. (2) The α0 has a little influence on λ and the p0 and b0 have no influence on λ.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

67-73

Citation:

Online since:

September 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Lanmin WANG, Yucheng SHI, Xu LIU. Loess dynamics. Beijing: Earthquake Press, 2003. (in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[2] Zhihui WU, Dingyi XIE, Xiongfei YU.Journal of Hydraulic Engineering,1994,(12): 67—71 (in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[3] Yasheng LUO, Dingyi XIE, Yonghong Li. Undisturbed loess dynamic triaxial test research and discussion. Collapsible loess research and engineering Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2000. 116-122. (in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[4] Xiangyi LEI. The loess plateau geological hazard and human activities. Beijing: Geological Press, 2001.

Google Scholar

[5] Jiyong LONG. Equivalent cycle load and dynamic damage properties of Q3 loess.Xi'an: Xi'an university of technology, 2006. (in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[6] HARIN B O, RICHART F E. Journal of The Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineers Division, American Society of Civil Engineering, 1963, 89(1): 603-624.

Google Scholar

[7] Lei FU, Hongjin WANG, Jingxing ZHOU. CHINESE Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2000, 22(4): 435-440. ( in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[8] Ying GUO, Maotian LUAN, Danda SHI. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2005, 26(8): 1195-1200. (in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[9] Ying GUO, Xiaoling ZHANG, Maotian LUAN. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2008, 29(3): 591-595. ( in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[10] Maotian LUAN, Chengxun XU, Ying Guo. Civil Engineering Journal, 2005:38(3):81-86. (in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[11] Dingyi XIE, Yangping YAO, Faning DANG. Advanced Soil Mechanics.Beijing: Higher education press, 2008. (in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[12] The Professional Standards Compilation Group of People's Republic of China. SL237-1999 soil test procedures. Beijing: China Waterpower Press, 1999. (in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[13] ISHIHARA K. Soil Behavior in Earthquake Geotechnics. New York:Oxford University press inc. 1996.

Google Scholar

[14] Jiexian WANG. The Dynamic Foundation and Basis. Beijing: Science press, 2001. ( in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[15] WANG Zhongning, YU Peiji. The influence of characteristic curve normalization of dynamic response Chinese civil engineering association fifth soil mechanics and engineering conference papers anthology, Bei jing: China Architecture & Building Press, 1990. 270-274. (in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[16] Yasheng LUO, Kanliang TIAN. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. 2005, 36(7):830- 834. (in Chinese)

Google Scholar