Study on Housing Performance Evaluation Model Based on Hierarchical Potential Support Vector Machine

Article Preview

Abstract:

Housing performance is an important and widely studied topic since it has significant impact on architecture design and programming. In terms of problems existing in the field, a new support vector machine technology, potential support vector machine, is introduced and then combined with decision tree to address issues on supplier selection including feature selection, multi-class classification and so on. And the methodology proposed in the paper, which is proved to the strengthens of integrating knowledge and experiences from experts in the paper, can be applied in housing performance evaluation which is one of complex issues combined with processes including not only quantitative, but also qualitative analysis.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

894-898

Citation:

Online since:

September 2011

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Hasselaar E. Health performance indicators of housing [A]. Proceedings of healthy buildings 2003 [C], ISIAQ, 2003.

Google Scholar

[2] Larsson NK, Cole RJ. A Second-generation environmental performance assessment system for buildings [A]. Green Building Challenge '98 conference retrospective [C], 1998.

Google Scholar

[3] iiSBE. Green Building Challenge 2002[A]. GBTool User Manual [M], 2002.

Google Scholar

[4] Cole RJ. Review of GBTool and analysis of GBC 2002 case-study projects [R]. iiSBE, 2002.

Google Scholar

[5] UK Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. HQI: Housing Quality Indicators Form[R], 2000.

Google Scholar

[6] Todd JA, Geissler S. Regional and cultural issues in environmental performance assessment for buildings [J]. Building Research and Information 1999; 27(4):247–56.

DOI: 10.1080/096132199369363

Google Scholar

[7] Sten de Godfried Augenbroe. Analysis of uncertainty in building design evaluations and its implications [J]. Energy and Buildings, 2002, 34: 951-958.

DOI: 10.1016/s0378-7788(02)00070-1

Google Scholar

[8] Sun-Sook Kim, In-Ho Yang, Myoung-Souk Yeo, Kwang-Woo Kim. Development of a housing performance evaluation model for multi-family residential buildings in Korea [J]. Building and Environment, 2005, 40:1103-1116.

DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2004.09.014

Google Scholar

[9] Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas, Jurgita Antucheviciene. Multiple criteria evaluation of rural building's regeneration alternatives [J]. Building and Environment, 2007, 42:1103-1116.

DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.08.001

Google Scholar

[10] S. Hochreiter, K. Obermayer. Support vector machines for dyadic data [J]. Neural Computation, 2006, 18(6): 1472-1510.

DOI: 10.1162/neco.2006.18.6.1472

Google Scholar

[11] B.SchÄolkopf, J.Shawe-Taylor, A.J. Smola. Generalization bounds via eigenvalues of the gram matrix [R]. Technical Report NC2-TR-1999-035, NeuroCOLT2, 1999.

Google Scholar

[12] Vapnik.V, The nature of statistical learning theory [M], London: Springer-Verlag, UK, 1995.

Google Scholar

[13] Vapnik.V, Statistical learning theory [M], New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1998.

Google Scholar

[14] http://ni.cs.tu-berlin.de/software/

Google Scholar