Large Torsion Deformation: Centrosymmetric Reentrant Honeycomb

Article Preview

Abstract:

There exist some problems in the crash box and anti-collision beam sandwich structure, such as monotone deformation pattern and uneconomical energy absorption performance. In order to raise the deformation capacity and energy absorption performance of sandwich structure, centrosymmetric reentrant honeycomb (CRH) and hexagonal centrosymmetric reentrant honeycomb (HCRH) are proposed based on auxetic reentrant honeycomb (ARH) in this work. Based on HCRH, four kinds of transverse combination structures and two kinds of longitudinal combination structures are obtained. The results of specific energy absorption show that the energy absorption capacity of the angular contact homodromous combination structure (ACOC) is about 3 times that of the other three transverse combination structures. Compared with longitudinal heterodromous combination structure (LHEC), the energy absorption capacity of longitudinal homodromous combination structure (LHOC) is improved by 72.7%.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

17-25

Citation:

Online since:

January 2022

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2022 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Lu Z X, Li X, Yang Z Y, Li X and Xie F 2016 J.Compos. Struct. 138 243-252.

Google Scholar

[2] Carta G, Brun M and Baldi A 2016 J. Mech. Mater. 97 67-75.

Google Scholar

[3] Chen Z, Wang Z, Zhou S, Shao J and Wu X 2018 J.Materials. 11(7) 1095.

Google Scholar

[4] Wang C Y, Wang W W, Zhao W Z, Wang Y L and Zhou G 2018 J. Compos. B. Eng. 153 78-96.

Google Scholar

[5] Jiang H, Ren Y, Jin Q, Zhu G, Hu Y, Cheng F 2020 J. Thin. Wall. Struct. 154 106911.

Google Scholar

[6] Wang W, Dai S, Zhao W, Wang C, Ma T, Chen Q 2020 J. Thin. Wall. Struct. 154 106863.

Google Scholar

[7] Gattas J M and You Z 2013 Proc. ASME Des. Eng. Tech. Conf. vol 6B p.032.

Google Scholar

[8] Fischer 2015 J. Thin. Wall. Struct. 90 31-40.

Google Scholar

[9] Kshad M A E, Popinigis C and Naguib H E 2018 J. Smart. Mater. Struct. 28(1) 015027.

Google Scholar

[10] Kavermann S Wand Bhattacharyya D 2019 J.Compos. Struct. 207 836-844.

Google Scholar

[11] Wickeler A L and Naguib H E 2020 J. Mater. Des. 186 108242.

Google Scholar