Design and Manufacture of Welding Fumes Electrostatic Precipitator and Parameter Study on Filtration Performance

Article Preview

Abstract:

Currently, the fumes and dust generated from metal cutting and welding are not often treated well in many factories. This paper presents the results of designing, manufacturing the welding fumes filter system by applying electrostatic precipitator methods as well as studying the factors affecting performance of filters. There are many factors that affect the efficiency of electrostatic precipitator filtration, in this study, the welding fumes filter was experimented with parameters of gas flow velocity, filter pipe diameter and power capacity to find out the appropriate parameters. The outlet air quality was measured with a dust concentration gauge and the Box-Behnken method was used to determine the relationship among experimental parameters. The filter parameters are optimized to achieve 99% of filtration efficiency. The research results will be applied in practice to ensure the health of users and improve the surrounding environment as well.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

115-129

Citation:

Online since:

June 2022

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2022 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Ngoc-Chan Tran, Pollution Mechanism of Dust Diffusion and Dust Collection Methods, Vol.2, Publishing House of Natural Sciences and Technology, (2001).

Google Scholar

[2] Sy-Mao Nguyen, Environment and Waste Treatment Process Engineering, Publishing House of Natural Sciences and Technology, (2008).

Google Scholar

[3] Tuan-Trieu Phan, Air Pollution Control Engineering, Publishing House of Civil Engineering, (2014).

Google Scholar

[4] Quy-Huy Trieu, Measurements of the velocity field of the flue gas flow an electrostatic precipirator to improve the filtration efficiency, National Research Institute of Mechanical Engineering, (2017).

Google Scholar

[5] Huu-Loc Nguyen, Experiments: Planning and Analysis, VNU-HCM Press, (2011).

Google Scholar

[6] Mengxiang Gao, Yong Zhu, Xin Yao, Jianwei Shi and Wenfeng Shangguan, Dust removal performance of two-stage electrostatic precipitators and its influencing factors, Powder Technology, (2019).

DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2019.03.016

Google Scholar

[7] Baoyu Guo, Aibing Yu and Jun Guo, Numerical Modelling of ESP for Design Optimization, Procedia Engineering, (2015).

Google Scholar

[8] Measuring Technical Information: FCI ST50 Series Flowmeters (2015), Proline t-mass B 150 (2015), ESP Model (2016).

Google Scholar

[9] G. Skodras, S.P. Kaldis, D. Sofialidis, O. Faltsi, P. Grammelis and G.P. Sakellaropoulos, Particulate removal via electrostatic precipitator - CFD simulation, Fuel Processing Technology, (2006).

DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2006.01.012

Google Scholar

[10] Karl B. Schnelle, Air Pollution Control Technology Handbook, CRC Press LLC, (2002).

Google Scholar

[11] Y. Tong, L. Liu, L Zhang, S. Bu, F. Chen, W. Shao, C. Feng, W. Xu, S. Qi and L. Fu, Separation of fine particulates using a honeycomb tube electrostatic precipitator equipped with arista electrodes, Separation and Purification Technology, (2019).

DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2019.116299

Google Scholar

[12] Bing Chen, Yongheng Guo, Hongjiao Li, Wenning Zhou and Baiqian Liu, Discharge characteristic of barbed electrodes in electrostatic precipitator, Journal of Electrostatics, (2021).

DOI: 10.1016/j.elstat.2020.103528

Google Scholar

[13] EN 779:2012, Particulate air filters for general ventilation, requirements, testing, marking.

Google Scholar

[14] M.R. Talaie, Mathematical modeling of wire-duct single-stage electrostatic precipitators, Journal of Hazardous Materials, (2005).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.01.007

Google Scholar