Spatial Effect Analysis on Shaking Table Tests of Subway Station Structure in Liquefiable Ground

Abstract:

Based on the test data of shaking table tests of subway station structure in liquefiable ground under both near-field and far-field earthquakes, the spatial effects of dynamic pore water pressure (PWP)and peak ground acceleration (PGA)of liquefiable ground as well as peak strain response of the subway station structure are analyzed. The results show that there exists time-lag phenomenon of dynamic PWP ratio of each measuring point on different observation planes. The characteristic of input ground motion has a noticeable influence on the spatial effect of dynamic PWP ratio. The PWP ratio obtained on the major observation plane presents to be larger than that on the minor one when under far-field Songpan wave. Meanwhile, the peak acceleration of measuring points on both major and minor planes increase with the growing peak acceleration of earthquake. The law of PGA and frequency spectral character of measuring points on different observation planes or at different depth varies with each other, and there present remarkable spatial effect. The peak strain of central cylinders at the top and middle floors on the major plane appear larger than that on the minor planes. However, the peak strain of central cylinders at the bottom floor are more remarkable than that of the top and middle floors, There are sharp contrasts among the peak strain responses in different spatial positions of the station structure.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 94-96)
• Pages: 1771-1781
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.94-96.1771
• Online since: September 2011
• Authors: Guo Xing Chen, Xi Zuo, Zhi Hua Wang, Xiu Li Du, Cheng Zhi Qi
• Keywords: Large-Scale Shaking Table Tests, Liquefiable Ground, Seismic Response, Spatial Effect, Underground Subway Station Structure

References

[1] Hamada M, Isoyama R, Wakamatsu K. Liquefaction induced ground displacement and its related damage to lifeline facilities[J]. Soils and Foundations, 1996, 36(1): 81-97.

DOI: 10.3208/sandf.36.special_81

[2] Tateishi A. A study on seismic analysis methods in the cross section of underground structures using static finite element method[J]. Structural Engineering Earthquake Engineering. 2005, 22(1): 41-53.

DOI: 10.2208/jsceseee.22.41s

[3] Iwatate T, Kobayashi Y, Kusu H, et al. Investigationand shaking table tests of subway structures of the Hyogoken-Nanbu earthquake[J]. Proc. of the 12WCEE, (2000)

[4] Yang Lin-de, Ji Qian-qian, Zheng Yong-lai, et al. Shaking table test on metro station structures in soft soil[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technolog, 2003, 40(1): 7-11

[5] CHEN Guo-xing, ZHUANG Hai-yang, DU Xiu-li, et al. Analysis of large-scale shaking table test of dynamic soil-subway station interaction[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2007, 27(2): 171-176.

[6] CHEN Guoxing, ZHUANG Haiyang, DU Xiuli, et al. A Large-size Shaking Table Test for Dynamic Soil-Metro Tunnel Interaction—Analysis on the test results[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2007, 27(1): 164-170.

[7] CHEN Guo-xing, ZUO Xi, WANG Zhi-hua, et al. Shaking Table Model Test of Subway Station Structure at Liquefiable Ground under Far Field and Near Field Ground Motion[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University: Engineering Science. 2010(10): 1955-1961

DOI: 10.1142/9789814365161_0039

[8] CHEN Guo-xing, ZUO Xi, WANG Zhi-hua, et al. Large scale shaking table test study of the dynamic damage behavior of subway station structure in liquefiable foundation under near-fault and far-field ground motions[J].China Civil Enginnering Journal，2010，43(12):63-69

DOI: 10.1142/9789814365161_0034

[9] CHEN Guo-xing, WANG Zhi-hua, ZUO Xi, et al. Development of laminar shear soil container for shaking table tests[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2010, 32(1): 89-97.

[10] HAN Xiao-jian, ZUO Xi, CHEN Guo-xing. 98 Channels' Dynamic Signal Acquisition System Development for Shaking Table Test Based on Virtual Instrument Technology[J]. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitgation Engineering. 2010, 30(5): 503-508.