The Implementation Mode of Urban Rail Based Transit Joint Development — Experiences from United States, Japan and Hong Kong

Abstract:

The urban rail based Transit Joint Development (TJD) has become one of the most important financing channels for constructing urban rail transit systems in China. Compared to the extensive research and application in planning field, the implementation of TJD still faced some difficulties such as organizational model selection, distribution of benefits and so on. In the 1980s and 1990s, the United States, Japan and Hong Kong developed a series of TJD practices and they formed three kinds of TJD mode: Public-Private Partnership, Enterprise Oriented, and Franchise. Empirical evidences have shown that differences among three modes are mainly reflected in the selection of implementation agency, allocation of functions and distribution of benefits. Then these distinctions will cause various impacts on the scale, cycle, form and operational management of TJDs. The conclusions of this research could provide valuable experience to the ongoing work of TJD in Chinese mega cities.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 97-98)
• Pages: 1149-1153
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.97-98.1149
• Online since: September 2011
• Authors: Lai Fang Sheng, Chao He Rong, Yan Song
• Keywords: Empirical Study, Implementation Mode, Transit Joint Development, Urban Rail Transit (URT)

References

[1] R. Cervero, C. Ferrell, S. Murphy: Transit-Oriented Development and Joint Development in the United States: A Literature Review (Transit Cooperative Research Program, 2002).

[2] L.Keefer: Profit Implications of Joint Development: Three Institutional Approaches (Urban Mass Transit Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1984).

[3] Yunlai Chen, Hanbin Luo: Journal of Huazhong Univsersity of Science and Technology (Urban Science Edition). Vol.22 (2005), p.116 [In Chinese]

[4] Hanbin Luo, Guihua Nie: Journal of Wuhan University of Technology (Information and Management Engineering). Vol.28 (2006), p.86 [In Chinese]

[5] YingYao, Guoli Ou: Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University (Social Science Edition). Vol.7 (2008), p.31 [In Chinese]

[6] Jinling Liu, Qinghuai Liang, Wenbin Deng: Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University (Social Science Edition). Vol.3 (2004), p.61 [In Chinese]

[7] Maode Lin: Urban Rapid Rail Transit. Vol.22 (2009), p.4 [In Chinese]

[8] Liming Yang, Qinghuai Liang, Sicheng Yuan: Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University (Social Science Edition). Vol.6 (2007), p.49 [In Chinese]

[9] Ruizhi Xiong: Research on the Joint Development of City Railway Transportation and Real Estate of Our Country (Huazhong Univsersity of Science and Technology, 2006). [In Chinese]

[10] J. Landis, R. Cervero, P. Hall: Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy. Vol.9 (1991), p.431

[11] Urban Land Institute. Joint Development: Making the Real Estate-Transit Connection (Beijing. China Architecture & Building Press, 2003). [In Chinese]

[12] R. Cervero: The transit metropolis: a global inquiry (Island Press, 1998).

[13] Mass Transit Railway Corporation: Annual Report. (Hong Kong, 2001).

[14] Laifang Sheng, Chaohe Rong: Comprehensive Transportation. Vol.6 (2009), p.26 [In Chinese]