Different Types Cross Section Columns Combination of Multi-Layer Steel Frames Optimum Design Analysis

Xue Zou; En He Bao

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1006-1007.61

Paper Titles

A Three-Dimensional Distribution Model of Pressure on Inner Surface of Elbow Pipe Based on FLUENT
p.42

An Agricultural Vehicle Frame Load Characteristic Agricultural Experimental Research
p.47

Analysis of Seismic Isolation Device for Earthquake Resistant Building Structure Reinforcement
p.51

Rise Steel Wind-Induced Response Analysis
p.56

Different Types Cross Section Columns Combination of Multi-Layer Steel Frames Optimum Design Analysis
p.61

Strength Calculation Based on Contact Nonlinear Analysis of Coupler Bolt with Three Methods
p.66

Analysis on Water Abundance of Loose Aquifer and Quality Evaluation of Overburden Strata during Mining under Loose Aquifer
p.73

Coal Mine Land Reclamation Measures — Open-Pit Coal Mine of Baofa Coal Co., LTD
p.78

Research on the Water Absorbent Laws of Injection Wells Formation
p.83

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vols. 1006-1007Different Types Cross Section Columns Combination...

Different Types Cross Section Columns Combination of Multi-Layer Steel Frames Optimum Design Analysis

Abstract:

In order to study the feasibility of different types cross section columns combination of multi-layer steel frames optimum design, considering the basic cycle, the first layer shear-weight ratio, steel weight of structure and other factors to establish different types of models. Through the each model fees of different engineering cost quota, then from cost of the project perspective to analyze the optimum design of multi-layer steel frames. The analysis results: Two kinds of calculations of the project cost of each model’s main structure are different, the project cost quota of Guangxi mainly depends on steel weight of each component type, but the project cost quota of Osaka region general considering the component types and cost of material and processing fees which are determined by section types, and welding quantity is single calculated, model CM4 corresponds well. On the whole, model CM4 has the lower expenses. So Guangxi district should refining component types and section types and then determine production and installation fees.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Advanced Manufacturing and Industrial Engineering

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 1006-1007)

Pages:

61-65

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1006-1007.61

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

August 2014

Authors:

Xue Zou, En He Bao*

Keywords:

Column Cross Section Type, Engineering Cost, Inter-Layer Response Values, Multi-Layer Steel Frame

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] Kequan Cai, Lizong Huang. Design and application of triangular added damping and stiffness frame[J] . Progress in steel building structure , 2002 (2); 16-23.

Google Scholar

[2] Hiroyuki TAGAWA, Gregory MACRAE, Laura LOWES. Evaluation of seismic response of multi-story structures using dynamic stability coefficients [J]. Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering (Transactions of AIJ), 2007, 618(8): 65-72. (In Japanese).

Google Scholar

[3] Mingyong Jing, Xinhua Guo, Jianyun Guo. Comparsion analysis of multi-layers steel frame cross section[J]. steel structure（supplement）2010: 720-723.

Google Scholar

[4] Jing Zou, Dewen Liu, Yuanqi Li. Engineering cost and synthesis economic performance of multi-layer steel structure[J]. Sichuan Building Science, 2010, 36（1）49-51.

Google Scholar

[5] Code of valuation with public building[S]. Japan Ministry of Communications, 2008, 3, 16-18.

Google Scholar

[6] Code of valuation with bill quantity of construction works（GB50500-2008)Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region detail implement rule[S]. 2008, 245-248.

Google Scholar