A Practical Evaluation Method for Human Security Risk in Single Operation of Power Supplying

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper proposes a risk evaluation method for human security during single power-supplying operation by use of expert evaluation, which serves for enhancing the human security level and power supplying reliability accordingly. The causes that affect human safety were distinguished into many factors which can be classified into 5 respects: man, machine, material, management and mediums, called ‘5M’ method. In order to quantize human safety risk, expert evaluation method was used to assess the human casualty accident occurrence probability value caused by these human security influencing factors. Then a practical evaluation method for human security risk was proposed by the product of human casualty accident (HCA) hazard with maximum probability and its probability value. Practicality of the proposed method was demonstrated on a real falling accident happened in 2005.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 1008-1009)

Pages:

765-770

Citation:

Online since:

August 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Guozhong Liu, Yongjun Zhang, Zhe Li, Yi Ling, Zexiang Cai: China Power, Vol. 40 (2007), p.85 (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[2] Yi Ling, Yongjun Zhang, Zhe Li, Zexiang Cai: Relay, Vol. 35 (2007), p.55 (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[3] Guang Liang, Yongjun Zhang, Hao Li, Ling Yi: Relay, Vol. 36 (2008), p.23 (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[4] Yulong Huang, Youcheng Li, Weiling Lin, Yunjun Zhang: Journal of Safety Science and Technology, Vol. 4 (2008), p.144 (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[5] Zhou Yuan, Zhijian Huang: Safety Principle (China Power Press, China, 2004).

Google Scholar

[6] Hui Shao, Kaiquan Wang: Safety Psychology. (Chemical Industry Press, China, 2004).

Google Scholar

[7] Shu Zhang Xiuzhi Shi: China Safety Science Journal, Vol. 21 (2011), p.23 (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[8] Xin Peng, Shiliang Shi, Runqiu Li, et al: China Safety Science Journal, Vol. 21 (2011), p.22 (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[9] Yulong Huang, Yi Ling, Yongjun Zhang: Guang Dong Electric Power, Vol. 21 (2008), p.1 (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[10] Long Ye, Sen Li: Safety Behavior (Tsinghua University Press, China, 2005).

Google Scholar

[11] Fuliang Xue: Construction Safety, , Vol. 14 (1999),. p.16 (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[12] Accident Report of China Southern Power Grid, (Safety Supervision Department of China Southern Power Grid, China, 2004-2013).

Google Scholar

[13] Jinping Wang, Fenglin Fan, Fawang Liu, etc.: North China Power Technology, No. 5 (2005), p.23 (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[14] Jae W. Kim, Wondea Jung: Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, Vol. 16 (2003), p.479.

Google Scholar

[15] Oliver Strater: Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol. 83 (2004), p.255.

Google Scholar

[16] Pierre Le Bot: Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol. 83 (2004), p.153.

Google Scholar

[17] Marzio Marseguerra, Enrico Zio, Massimo Librizzi: Annals of Nuclear Energy, Vol. 33 (2006), p.894.

Google Scholar

[18] Y.H.J. Chang, A. Mosleh: Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol. 92 (2007), p.1014.

Google Scholar

[19] Jussi K. Vaurio: Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol. 94 (2009), p.1818.

Google Scholar

[20] The Electricity Accident (Incident) Investigation Procedures of China Southern Power Grid Co., LTD, December 31, (2011).

Google Scholar

[21] Ed M. Dougherty: Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol. 55 (1997), p.209.

Google Scholar