Economic Evaluation Model of Grid Construction Project Based on Real Option Theory

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper combined with the real conditions on investment and decision-making of grid construction. Considering the uncertainty of project, we applies real option theory into evaluation model of grid construction and establishes evaluation model of grid construction based on real option theory. The result indicates that proper application of real option method into the investment decision-making model of grid construction can better enable grid to obtain profit from investment uncertainty, which provides larger profit and opportunity for grid corporation.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 1008-1009)

Pages:

800-803

Citation:

Online since:

August 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Min K. J, Wang C.H. Generation Planning for Inter-elated Generation Units: A Real Options Approach. In Proceedings of IEEE Power Engineering Society 2000 Summer Meeting, Vol4. Seattle (WA, USA), 2000. 2261-2265.

DOI: 10.1109/pess.2000.867343

Google Scholar

[2] Wang C.H. Generation Planning for Electric Power Utilities under Market Uncertainties: A Real Options Approach, Doctoral Dissertation. Ames (IA, USA): Iowa Stare University, (2001).

DOI: 10.31274/rtd-180813-10995

Google Scholar

[3] PM Herder. Options for real options: dealing with uncertainty in investment decisions for electricity networks [J]. IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 2005 (4): 3682-3688.

DOI: 10.1109/icsmc.2005.1571719

Google Scholar

[4] Ji Xingquan, Wen Fushuan. Decision-making Method on Real Option in Power Generation Investment[J]. Power System Automation, 2005, 29(11): 2-5.

Google Scholar

[5] Xiao Zhi, Zou Gang. Staged Investment Decision Study on Grid Expansion and Reconstruction Based on Real Option[J]. Science and Management Study, 2007, 4: 185-190.

Google Scholar