Study on Fructan Metabolism and Enzyme Activity of Helianthus tuberosus L.

Article Preview

Abstract:

“Qingyu 2” Helianthus tuberosus L. was used to study fructan metabolism and the synthesis and degradation enzyme activity in the whole growth period of Helianthus tuberosus on dry land and irrigated land. The results show that, SST is mainly expressed in the leaves, the main site to synthesis kestose. FFT has high level expression mainly in the tuber expansion stage and then synthesis the DP ≥ 4 fructan. The stem with small fructan biosynthesis and degradation is a temporary fructan storage site. Before and after blossom, FEH activity reaches the peak in leaves and tubers. Fructan synthesizes and accumulates mainly in the rapid growth period and tuber formation stage, and remains stable in blossom stage before transfering rapidly to tubers from leaves and stems inexpansion period. Drought stress on dry land does not affect the fructan metabolism before blossom, but prevents the FEH expression in blossom, which delays fructan transfer to the tubers and FFT expression of tubers.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 1010-1012)

Pages:

229-234

Citation:

Online since:

August 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] María E, Nancy Galicia-Lagunas, Rodríguez-Alegría, et al. Food Chemistry, 129(2): 380~386 (2011).

Google Scholar

[2] Zheng ZHOU , Hailong CAO, Yu ZHU. et al. Acta Agriculturae Borealioccidental is Sinica, 17( 4) : 297~301, 305 (2008) In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[3] Dan-mei LIU, Ji-yu JIANG, Jun YANG, Northern Horticulture, 10 : 140~142 (2009) In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[4] Tao KONG, Nan ZHANG, Feng-mei LIN et al. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 6: 108~113 (2013) In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[5] Zu-xin LIU, Guang-hui XIE. Journal of China Agricultural University, 17(6): 122~123(2012) In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[6] Ji X M, Van den Ende W, Schroeven L et al. New Phytologist, 173(1): 50~62(2007).

Google Scholar

[7] Amiard V, Annette M B, Billard J P, et al. Plant Physiology, 132(4): 2218~2229(2003).

Google Scholar

[8] Dong JIANG, ZhenWen YU, YongGeng LI, et al. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2002, 28, 179~85 In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[9] Kuhbauch W , Thome U. Plant Physiol, 134: 243~250(1989).

Google Scholar

[10] Pheloung P C, Siddique K H M. Ann RevPlant Physiol, 36: 517~568(1985).

Google Scholar

[11] Pollock C J , L loyd E J , Stoddard J L. Physiol Plan t, 59: 257~262(1983).

Google Scholar

[12] Mino Y, Maeda K. J Jpn Grass Soc, 20: 6~10( 1974).

Google Scholar

[13] SUN Xue-mei, LI Yi, WANG Li-hui, et al. Journal of Anhui Agri. Sci, 39(26): 16001~16003(2011) In Chinese.

Google Scholar