Determining a Robust, Pareto Optimal Geometry for a Welded Joint

Simon Barrans; H.E. Radhi

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1016.39

Paper Titles

Study on Water Cushion Belt Conveyor
p.14

A Game Theoretic Analysis on Cloud Manufacturing Model
p.19

Study the Effect of CaCO₃Nanoparticles on the Mechanical Properties of Virgin and Waste Polypropylene
p.23

Contact Pressure Distribution in Joints Formed by V-Band Clamps
p.34

Determining a Robust, Pareto Optimal Geometry for a Welded Joint
p.39

Application of Peridynamic Theory to Nanocomposite Materials
p.44

Application of Shainin Design of Experiment Method on Metal Turning Operation
p.49

Study of a W-Beam Guardrail Behaviour in Road Safety Barriers
p.54

Analysis of the Torsional Load Capacity of V-Section Band Clamps
p.59

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vol. 1016Determining a Robust, Pareto Optimal Geometry for...

Determining a Robust, Pareto Optimal Geometry for a Welded Joint

Abstract:

Multi-criteria optimization problems are known to give rise to a set of Pareto optimal solutions where one solution cannot be regarded as being superior to another. It is often stated that the selection of a particular solution from this set should be based on additional criteria. In this paper a methodology has been proposed that allows a robust design to be selected from the Pareto optimal set. This methodology has been used to determine a robust geometry for a welded joint. It has been shown that the robust geometry is dependent on the variability of the geometric parameters.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volume 1016)

Pages:

39-43

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1016.39

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

August 2014

Authors:

Simon Barrans*, H.E. Radhi

Keywords:

Multi-Criteria Optimization, Robust Design, Welded Joints

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] G. Taguchi: On Robust Technology Development: Bringing Quality Engineering Upstream. New York: ASME Press(1993).

Google Scholar

[2] A. Osyczka: Application of multicriterion optimizationmethods to machine tool design and manufacturing process, Proceedings of Fifth International Conference on Production Engineering, Tokyo, 558–566 (1984).

Google Scholar

[3] J. Branke, K. Deb, K. Miettinen andR. Slowinski: Multiobjective Optimization -Interactive and Evolutionary Approaches, Springer- Verlag (2008).

Google Scholar

[4] D. Bertsimas, D.B. Brown, and C. Caramanis: Theory and applications of robust optimization. SIAM Review 53, 464–501 (2011).

DOI: 10.1137/080734510

Google Scholar

[5] D.A. Iancu, N. Trichakis: Pareto Efficiency in Robust Optimization. Management Science 60(1), 130-147 (2014).

DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2013.1753

Google Scholar

[6] ] O. Koksoy and T. Yalcinoz: Robust Design using Pareto type optimization: A genetic algorithm with arithmetic crossover, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 55(1), 208-218 (2008).

DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2007.11.019

Google Scholar

[7] W. Chen, J. Unkelbach, A. Trofimov, T. Madden, H. Kooy, T. Bortfeld, D. Craft: Including robustness in multi-criteria optimization for intensity-modulated proton therapy. Physics MedicineBiol. 57(3), 591–608 (2012).

DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/3/591

Google Scholar

[8] Mmode FRONTIER v4. 0 User manual. Trierste, Italy: ESTECO srl (2008).

Google Scholar

[9] ] D. Ullman: The Mechanical Design Process, 4th Ed, McGraw-Hill (2009).

Google Scholar