Bait Selection of Butterflies at Dong Phayayen-Khao Yai Forest Complex World Heritage, Thailand

Article Preview

Abstract:

Butterflies mainly feed on flower nectar and juice of rotting fruit, carrion, or dung. To attract butterflies, we tested 8 fermented fruits and fish bait types in dry evergreen and secondary forest at Dong Phayayen-Khao Yai Forest Complex World Heritage, Thailand. Three replicates of each bait traps were hang in an open area from 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. once a month from May to October 2010. We found a total of 79 butterfly species (3,038 individuals). The average number of species and individuals were significantly different among bait types, months, and forest types (p<0.01). Fermented fish mixed with fermented pineapple attracted the most species (69 species) since it contained both sodium and amino acids, followed by fish sauce (49 species), fermented fish (46 species), pineapple (35 species), banana (26 species), papaya (17 species), watermelon (11 species) and beer (8 species), respectively. The most commonly attracted butterfly was Euploea core (427 individuals), followed by Euploea radamanthus (288) individuals), Caleta roxus (234 individuals), Parantica aglea (211 individuals), Tirumala septentrionis (123 individuals), and Prosotas gracilis (117 individuals), respectively. Therefore, fermented fish mixed with fermented pineapple is recommended as a bait to attract fruit-feeding butterflies in the tropic..

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 1030-1032)

Pages:

683-686

Citation:

Online since:

September 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] H. Ômura, K. Honda, and N. Hayashi: Identification of feeding attractants in oak sap for adults of two nymphalid butterflies, Kaniska canace and Vanessa indica. Physiological Entomology. Vol. 25(3) (2000), p.281–287.

DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-3032.2000.00193.x

Google Scholar

[2] A. Dierks, and K. Fischer: Feeding responses and food preferences in the tropical, fruit feeding butterfly, Bicyclus anynana. Journal of Insect Physiology. Vol. 54(9) (2008), p.1363–1370.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2008.07.008

Google Scholar

[3] J. Beck, E. Muhlenberg, and K. Fiedler:  Mud-pudding behavior in tropical butterflies: in search of proteins or minerals? Oecologia. Vol. 119(1) (1999), pp.140-148.

DOI: 10.1007/s004420050770

Google Scholar

[4] M. Nyafwonoa, A. Valtonena, P. Nyeko, and H. Roininena: Fruit-feeding butterfly communities as indicators of forest restoration in an Afro-tropical rainforest. Biological Conservation. Vol. 174 (2014), p.75–83.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.03.022

Google Scholar

[5] J. L. Bossart, E. Opuni-Frimpong, S. Kuudaar, and E. Nkrumah: Richness, abundance, and complementarity of fruit-feeding butterfly species in relict sacred forests and forest reserves of Ghana. Biodiversity and Conservation. Vol. 15 (2006).

DOI: 10.1007/s10531-005-2574-6

Google Scholar

[6] P.J. DeVries, D. Murray, and R. Land: Species diversity in vertical, horizontal and temporal dimensions of a fruit-feeding butterfly community in an Ecuadorian rainforest. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. Vol. 62 (1997), p.343–364.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1997.tb01630.x

Google Scholar

[7] P. J. DeVries, L. G. Alexander, I. A. Chacon, and J. A. Fordyce: Similarity and difference among rainforest fruit-feeding butterfly communities in Central and South America. Journal of Animal Ecology. Vol. 81 (2012), p.472–482.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2011.01922.x

Google Scholar

[8] J. L. Bossart, and E. Opuni-Frinpong: Distance from edge determines fruit-feeding butterfly community diversity in Afrotropical forest fragments. Environmental Entomology. Vol. 38 (2009), pp.43-52.

DOI: 10.1603/022.038.0107

Google Scholar

[9] J.K. Hill, K.C. Hamer, J. Tangah, and M. Dawood: Ecology of tropical butterflies in rainforest gaps. Oecologia. Vol. 128 (2001), pp.294-302.

DOI: 10.1007/s004420100651

Google Scholar

[10] O.J. Marini-Filho, and R.P. Martins: Nymphalid butterfly dispersal among forest fragments at Serra da Canastra National Park, Brazil. Journal Insect Conservation. Vol. 14 (2010), pp.401-411.

DOI: 10.1007/s10841-010-9271-9

Google Scholar

[11] D.B. Ribeiro, R. Batista, P. I Prado, K.S. Brown Jr, and A.V.L. Freitas: The importance of small scales to fruit-feeding butterfly assemblages in fragmented landscape. Biodiversity and Conservation. Vols. 21 (2010), pp.811-827.

DOI: 10.1007/s10531-011-0222-x

Google Scholar

[12] C.L.B. Sant'Anna, D.B. Ribeiro, L.C. Garcia, and A.V.T. Freitas: Fruit-feeding butterfly communities are influenced by restoration age in tropical forests. Restoration ecology. DOI: 10. 1111/rec. 12091 (2014).

DOI: 10.1111/rec.12091

Google Scholar

[13] K. Boonvanno, S. Wananasit, and S. Permkarm: Butterfly diversity at Ton Nga Chang Wildlife Sanctuary, Songkhla Province, Southern Thailand. Science Asia Vol. 26 (2000), pp.105-111.

Google Scholar

[14] P. Batra: Butterfly Monitoring Protocol. Tropical ecology, assessment, and monitoring team initiative. Center for Applied Biodiversity Science. (2006) www. teamnetwork. org/ files/.. /butterfly/TEAMButterfly-PT-EN-2. 1. pdf.

Google Scholar

[15] P. Ek-Amnuay: Butterflies of Thailand. Baan Lae Suan Press (2006).

Google Scholar

[16] P. Suwanwaree, and S. Lapkratok: The Relationships between Butterfly Diversity and Different Forest Ecosystems at Sakaerat Environmental Research Station. Research Report. Suranaree University of Technology (2010).

Google Scholar