Ballistic Impact: A Comparative Case Study Using Lagrangian Method with Erosion Criterion and SPH

Article Preview

Abstract:

The ballistic simulation attempted in this work is among the most difficult as both the projectile and the target experience significant deformations. Traditionally these simulations have been performed using a Lagrangian approach, i.e. a deformable mesh with large mesh deformations. There are three often used techniques when studying ballistic problems with the Lagrangian method: remeshing (generally not available for 3D hexahedra meshes), the 'pilot hole' technique and material erosion. Because these techniques imply element removal, in order to allow the calculation to continue, the Lagrangian method lacks a physical basis. Moreover, no general guidance exists for selecting one of the three techniques mentioned before. The Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamic method as implemented in the commercial code LS-DYNA has been used in this paper to solve the problem of the impact between different caliber projectiles and various types of metal targets. The results are compared to those produced by dynamic analysis using conventional finite element methods with material erosion as implemented in LS-DYNA.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

568-573

Citation:

Online since:

October 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] L. B. Lucy, A numerical approach to the testing of the fission hypothesis., The Astronomical Journal 82 (1977).

Google Scholar

[2] R. A. Gingold and J. J. Monaghan, Smoothed particle hydrodynamics: theory and application to nonspherical stars., Mon. Not. Royal. Astr. Soc. 181 (1977).

Google Scholar

[3] T. Belytschko, Y. Y. Lu, and L. Gu, Element-free galerkin methods., Int. Journal Numer. Methds. Eng. (1994).

Google Scholar

[4] I. Babuska and J. M. Melenk, The partition of unity method., Int. Journal Numer. Methds. Eng. (1997).

Google Scholar

[5] B. Nayroles, G. Touzot, and P. Villon, Generalizing the finite element method: diffuse approximation and diffuse elements., Comput. Mech. (1992).

DOI: 10.1007/bf00364252

Google Scholar

[6] W. K. Liu, S. Li, and T. Belytschko, Moving least square reproducing kernel methods part 1: Methodology and convergence., Computer Methds. Appl. Mech. Eng. (1977).

DOI: 10.1016/s0045-7825(96)01132-2

Google Scholar

[7] LS-DYNA keyword user's manual.

Google Scholar