Technology Utilization as Competitive Advantage - A Sociotechnical Approach to High Performance Work Systems

Abstract:

This conceptual paper underlines the necessity of research into sociotechnical systems in modern high-tech industries. Production of sophisticated products is foreseen to build the competitiveness of the advanced economies’ industrial sectors in the future. Increasingly, competitiveness in such industries depends on a complex interaction between social factors such as knowledge sharing, knowledge generation, learning and innovation, and technical factors such as robotization, automation and information systems. However, up to now, improvements and developments in these industries have tended to be biased towards the technology side. To balance this and to take into account the necessity of more effective human – machine interaction, and the need of knowledge sharing, learning and innovation, it proposes a mode for how to challenge highly automated, high-tech and knowledge based high-cost manufacturing, where: 1) State-of-the-art technology is necessary, but not sufficient; 2) state-of-the-art technology requires high level of competence and advanced organization, and 3) a joint organizational and technical perspective is needed in order to develop sustainable competitiveness through high performance work systems in high-tech manufacturing. Operational excellence in such niches requires companies that, through sophisticated practices of organization and management, are able to exploit systems of advanced manufacturing technology.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volume 1039)
• Pages: 555-561
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1039.555
• Online since: October 2014
• Authors: Gaute Knutstad*, Johan E. Ravn
• Keywords: High Performance Work Systems, High-Tech Industries, Involvement, Knowledge Generation, Management, Sociotechnical Systems

References

[1] Roland Berger, Industry 4. 0. The New Industrial Revolution, Roland Berger Strategy Consultants, (2014).

[2] Chandler, A. D., The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, (1977).

[3] Taylor, F. W. The Principles of Scientific Management, W.W. Norton & Company, New York, (1911).

[4] Ford, H., Ford on management: harnessing the American spirit (reprinted from My Life and Work, 1922 and My Philosophy of Industry, 1929), Blackwell, Oxford, (1991).

[5] Womack, J.P., D.T. Jones & D. Roos, The Machine that changed the world, Rawson Associates, New York, (1990).

[6] Boyer, K.K., et al., Unlocking the potential of advanced manufacturing technologies. Journal of Operations Management, 15 (1997) 331-347.

[7] Rolstadås, A., et al., Action Roadmap on Key Area 5, in IMS 2020 Roadmaps 2010, NTNU, Trondheim, (2010).

[8] Netland, T. H. et al., Towards the factory of the future in high-tech industries. APMS 2010. Cernobbio, Como, Italy.

[9] Barley, S.R., Technicians in the Workplace: Ethnographic Evidence for Bringing Work into Organizational Studies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1996) 404-441.

DOI: 10.2307/2393937

[10] Trist, E. and K. Bamforth, Some social and psychological consequences of the longwall method of coal getting, Human Relations, 4 (1951), 3-38.

DOI: 10.1177/001872675100400101

[11] Trist, E., The evolution of socio-technical systems: a conceptual framework and an action research program, Journal of Issues in the Quality of Working Life, Ontario, (1981).

[12] Appelbaum, E. et al., Manufacturing competitive advantage: The effects of high performance work systems on plant performance and company outcomes, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, (2000).

[13] De Sitter, L., J. Hertog, and B. Dankbaar, From Complex Organizations with Simple Jobs to Simple Organizations with Complex Jobs, Human Relations, 50 (1997) 497-534.

DOI: 10.1177/001872679705000503

[14] Eijnatten, F. M. v., The paradigm that changed the work place, Van Gorcum, Assen, 193.

[15] Latour, B., Science in Action, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, (1987).

[16] Mueller, F., S. Proctor, and D. Buchanan, Teamworking in its context(s): Antecedents, nature and dimensions. Human Relations, 53 (2000), 1387-1424.

DOI: 10.1177/00187267005311001

[17] Delbridge, R., J. Lowe, and N. Oliver, Shopfloor responsibilities under lean teamworking. Human Relations, 53 (2000), 1459-1479.

DOI: 10.1177/00187267005311003

[18] Appelbaum, E. and R. Batt, High Performance Work Systems: American Models of Workplace Transformation, Economic Policy Institute, Washington D. C, (1993).

[19] Boxall, P. and K. Macky, Research and theory on high-performance work systems: progressing the high-involvement stream. Human Resource Management Journal. 19 (2009), 3-23.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-8583.2008.00082.x

[20] Cutcher-Gershenfeld, J., et al., Japanese team-based work systems in North America: explaining the diversity. California Management Review, 37 (1994), 42-64.

DOI: 10.2307/41165777

[21] Ingvaldsen, J.A., H. Holtskog, and G. Ringen, Unlocking work standards through systematic work observation: implications for team supervision. Team Performance Management, 19 (2013), 279-291.

DOI: 10.1108/tpm-11-2012-0039

[22] Kim, J., J.P. MacDuffie, and F.K. Pil, Employee voice and organizational performance: team versus representative influence. Human Relations 63 (2010), 371-394.

DOI: 10.1177/0018726709348936

[23] Shah, R. and P.T. Ward, Defining and developing measures of lean production. Journal of Operations Management, 25 (2007), 785-805.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jom.2007.01.019

[24] Sandberg, Å., (ed. ), Enriching production: Perspectives on Volvo's Uddevalla plant as an alternative to lean production, Avebury, Aldershot, (1995).

DOI: 10.1177/017084069601700509

[25] Huys, R., M. Ramioul, and G. Van Hootegem, High performance workplaces: Background paper for the Third European Company Survey, European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, Dublin, (2013).

[26] Adler, P.S., The Future of Critical Management Studies: A Paleo-Marxist Critique of Labour Process Theory, Organization Studies, 28 (2007), 1313-1345.

DOI: 10.1177/0170840607080743

[27] Kern, H. and M. Schumann, Das Ende der Arbeitsteilung?, Beck, München, (1984).

[28] Ingvaldsen, J.A., Organizational Learning: Bringing the Forces of Production Back in. Organization Studies, 2014, forthcoming.

[29] Rolfsen, M. and C. Langeland, Successful maintenance practice through team autonomy, Employee Relations, 34 (2012), 306-321.

DOI: 10.1108/01425451211217725

[30] Bartel, A., C. Ichniowski, and K. Shaw, How Does Information Technology Affect Productivity? Plant-Level Comparisons of Product Innovation, Process Improvement, and Worker Skills, the Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122 (2007). 1721-1758.

DOI: 10.1162/qjec.2007.122.4.1721

[31] Brown, J.S. and P. Duguid, Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation. Organization Science, 2 (1991), 40-57.

DOI: 10.1287/orsc.2.1.40

[32] Backman, M., S. Borjesson, and S. Setterberg, Working with Concepts in the Fuzzy Front End: Exploring the Context for Innovation for Different Types of Concepts at Volvo Cars. R&D Management, 37 (2007), 17-28.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2007.00455.x

[33] Porter, M.E. and M.R. Kramer, Creating shared value: how to reinvent capitalism-and unleash a wave of innovation and growth. Harvard Business Review, (2011).

DOI: 10.1007/978-94-024-1144-7_16

[34] Achterbergh, J. and D. Vriens, Organizations: Social Systems Conducting Experiments, Springer, (2010).