Benefit Analysis and FGD Optimization for Designed Power Plant Based on Comprehensive Benefit Index System

Article Preview

Abstract:

Taking the initial design value for target power plant as standard index values, two comprehensive benefit index systems for flue gas desulphurization (FGD) technology were formed by mean square difference method with or without the index of earning of by-product, to analyze the environmental benefit, economic benefit, technology benefit and comprehensive benefit of six flue gas desulphurization technologies on designed power plant and obtained the optimal technology ultimately. For the index system with index of earning of by-product, the optimal FGD technology is wet ammonia desulphurization, not only possesses the biggest comprehensive benefit, but also the biggest economical and technology benefit for designed power plant. For the index system without the index of earning of by-product, the wet ammonia desulphurization, limestone wet desulfurization and simple wet desulfurization have similar comprehensive benefits, but individual advantage on environmental, economic and technology benefit separately.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 1044-1045)

Pages:

255-258

Citation:

Online since:

October 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] P.D. Zhang: Front. Env. Sci. Eng. Vol. 7 (2013), p.867.

Google Scholar

[2] W.J. Jiang. Technical handbook of flue gas desulfurization and denitration. Beijing: Chemical industry press, (2006).

Google Scholar

[3] Economic evaluation of flue gas desulfurization systems. New York: EPRI, (1991).

Google Scholar

[4] Flue gas desulfurization system performance. London: IEA, (1986).

Google Scholar

[5] Q.H. Dai, G.B. Liu and M.Y. Liu: J. Geogr. Sci. Vol. 60 (2001), p.209.

Google Scholar

[6] Y.Z. Jia, Y. Hu and S.J. Sun: Sci. Technol. Engin. Vol. 10 (2010), p.1671.

Google Scholar