Data Processing in Scientific Research Performance Evaluation of University Based on DEA and Supervision Measures

Abstract:

The university scientific research performance has being a hot issue in recent years. The scientific research performance evaluation of university is one of important bases for rationally allocating educational resources. Data processing is very important for evaluation. This study analyzes many factors that affect the university scientific research performance to collect evaluation indicators for data processing. The collected indicators are classified into input indicators and output indicators. Then Factor Analysis is used to reduce the number of two types of indicators with professional software SPSS. Further, the selected 32 universities are evaluated on research performance by using DEA method. Finally, the results of scientific research performance of university are obtained, and the improvements and supervision measures are proposed.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volume 1046)
• Pages: 554-559
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1046.554
• Online since: October 2014
• Authors: Yun Na Wu, Jian Ping Yuan*
• Keywords: Data Processing, DEA Method, Factor Analysis, Scientific Research Performance, Supervision Measures

References

[1] Wang Bacon. Higher Economics [M]. Beijing: Economic Management Publishing Society, (2004).

[2] Yang Zhou Fu, Jianjun. University Financial Research Evaluation [M]. Beijing: China Renmin University Press, (2002).

[3] Song Liping, peace. Construction of university performance evaluation system [J]. Choi Would Monthly: Theory, 2006, (3): 9-11.

[4] Zhang Guoyu. Performance Evaluation of quantitative research universities -- Factor Analysis Application [J]. NAEA, 2008, (6): 16-24.

[5] ZHANG Qing-wen, Ma Ling. University of reliability and performance evaluation index system efficiency Analysis [J]. Hebei University: Philosophy and Social Sciences, 2009, (3): 88 ~ 92.

[6] Zhang Yawei, Wangan You. Comprehensive Performance Evaluation Based on quantitative indicators law college Price [J]. NAEA, 2009, (6): 49 ~ 53.

[7] should Wangjiang, Li Quanying. Performance Evaluation Index System Design and Application of universities Study [J]. NAEA, 2010, (2): 45 ~ 50.

[8] Qi Wei, et al. Based on TOPSIS Chinese research university academic performance Research efficiency evaluation method [J]. China Higher Education Research, 2010, (1): 15 ~ 19.

[9] Lu Wei, Wang Wei with. Performance Evaluation of public expenditure on education indicators body Department of Construction [J]. Financial Research, 2007, (8): 24 ~ 29.

[10] Chen Hongxia. Rethinking the University of performance evaluation screening [J]. Technology Surgery and Innovation Management, 2008, (5): 255 - 257.

[11] Ma Ling, ZHANG Qing-wen. Based on the strategic perspective of teaching and research university Performance Evaluation System [J]. Hebei Academic Journal, 2009, (5): 235 - 237.

[12] Jia Junping. Statistics [M]. Beijing: Renmin University of China Press.