The Methods of Bridge Deformation Measurement

Article Preview

Abstract:

The template Contrast several methods applied in bridge deformation monitoring method, expounding the advantages and disadvantages of each method simple and clearly, providing guiding significance for practical engineering of bridge deformation monitoring.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 1065-1069)

Pages:

2270-2272

Citation:

Online since:

December 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Ashkenazi V., Roberts GW. Experimental monitoring of the Humber Bridge using GPS [J]. Civil Engineering Iniemational, 1998, 20(2): 39-43.

Google Scholar

[2] Brown C.J., Karuna R., Ashkenazi V., Roberts G.W. and Evans R.A., Monitoring of structures using the Global Positioning System[A]. Proc., Institutiong of Civil Engineers Structures and Buildings, 1999, 97-105.

DOI: 10.1680/istbu.1999.31257

Google Scholar

[3] ZHANG Zu-xun, ZHANG Jian-qing, ZHANG Shi-xing. Three-Dimensional Building Model Based on Single Image[C]. [s. l. ]. Workshops on Automatic Engineering Surveying of Channel. 2001. 112-118.

Google Scholar

[4] Franka, Heuvel. Vanishing Point Detection for Architectural[J]. Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. 1998. 32(5). 652-659.

Google Scholar

[5] Axelsson,P. DEM generation from laser scanner data using adaptive TIN models[J]. International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2000, 33(B4/1): 110-117.

Google Scholar

[6] R.E. Kalman. ANewAPProaehtoLinearFilteringandPredietion Problems[D]. (1960).

Google Scholar

[7] BrownC.J., KarunaR., AshkenaziV., RobertsG.W. andEvans R.A., MonitoringofstruetUreesusingtheGlobalPositioningSystem[A]Pro. cInstitUtiongofCivilEngineersStrueturesandBuildings, 1999, 97-105.

Google Scholar

[8] Tsai R.Y. A versatile camera calibration technique for high-accuracy 3D machinevision metrology using off-the-shelf TV cameras and lenses[J]. IEEE Journal of Robotics and Automation. 1987. 3(4). pp.323-344.

DOI: 10.1109/jra.1987.1087109

Google Scholar

[9] Shortis M., Fraser C.S. Current trends in close range optical 3D measurement for industratrial and engineering applications[J]. Suvey Review. 1991. 31(242). pp.188-200.

DOI: 10.1179/sre.1991.31.242.188

Google Scholar

[10] Kilian, J., Haala, N., Englich, M. Capture and evaluation of airborne laser scanner data. International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Vol. XXXI, Part B3, Vienna. 1996, 383-388.

Google Scholar