Based the Active Defense Substation Domain Strategy Control Method to against Blackout

Article Preview

Abstract:

In the previous blackout, overload components out of operation often leaded to the expansion of the accident. One active defense substation domain strategy control system was proposed to prevent the N-1 contingencies to N-2 contingencies caused blackout. Through the substation elements states real time analysis , the active defense control strategy was created by learn from the principles and action messages of backup switching equipment, protection and automatic stability control devices. In order to keep the overall system stability, the active defense control strategy was completed by actively put in the standby element or quit part of the overload elements, to make the system into a new equilibrium state. Contrasting these control strategies by PSCAD/EMTDC simulation software, the results presented that this strategy could quickly change the “Close to collapse” zone into the stability states and the building program simple and practical.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 1070-1072)

Pages:

687-692

Citation:

Online since:

December 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] LIN Weifang, TANG Yong, SUN Huadong, GUO Qiang, ZHAO Hongguang, ZENG Bing, Blackout in Brazil Power Grid Oil February 4, 2011 and Inspirations for Stable Operation of Power Grid, Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2011, 35(9): 1-5.

Google Scholar

[2] LI Zaihua, BAI Xiaomin, DING Jian. Analysis of the western Europe blackout. Automation of Electric Power Systems,2007, 31(1): 1-3.

Google Scholar

[3] YIN Yonghua, GUO Jianbo, ZHAO Jianjun, et a1.Preliminary analysis of large scale blackout in interconnected North America, power grid on August l4 and lessons to be drawn. Power System Technology, 2003, 27(10): 8-11.

Google Scholar

[4] GAN Deqiang, HU Jiangyi, HAN Zhenxiang. After the 2003 blackouts across several continentals. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2004, 28(3): 1-4.

Google Scholar

[5] Dobson I, Thorp J Chen J S, Carreras B A, et a1. Examing criticality of blackouts in power system models with cascading events. Proceeding of the 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2002.

DOI: 10.1109/hicss.2002.993975

Google Scholar

[6] GU Xueping, ZHANG Shuo, LIANG Haiping, JIA Jinghua, WANG Yong, Risk assessment of power grid cascading failure considering system operation conditions, 2010, 38(24), 124-129.

Google Scholar

[7] HU Xuehao. Rethinking and enlightenment of large scope blackout in interconnected north America power grid. Power System Technology, 2003, 27(9): 3-6.

Google Scholar

[8] ZHANG Wei, PAN Zhencun, ZHAO Jianguo , New Load Shedding Control Strategy for Backup Protection Against Cascading Outages, Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2007, 31(8): 27-31.

DOI: 10.1049/cp:20061714

Google Scholar

[9] XUE Yusheng, Space-time Cooperative Framework for Defending Blackouts Part I From Isolated Defense Lines to Coordinated Defending, Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2006, 30(1): 8-12.

DOI: 10.1049/cp:20062255

Google Scholar

[10] ZHU Xiao-tong, ZHAO Qingchun, LI Yuanyuan, SHEN Jun, SHEN Guorong,A new method to prevent maloperation of phase-to-phase zone Ⅲ relays due to overload, Power System Protection, 2011, 39(9): 7-11.

Google Scholar