Species Coexistence in Ecosystems with Specialist Predation: Trophic Regulation in Gradients of Resource Productivity

Article Preview

Abstract:

Specialist predation is believed to play a crucial role in maintaining biodiversity of ecosystems, whereas its underlying mechanism is still unclear. Here we analyzed a general model of a tritrophic system containing specialist predators. A new graphical approach based on the balance of resource recruitment and consumption was used. The analyses show that specialist predation can promote coexistence of producer species by increasing resource availability, which waken the exploitive competition between producers. The R* rule, the dominant rule in traditional resource competition theory, is still dominant in infertile environment. In rich environment, the occurrence of specialist predator increases the equilibrium resource concentration and thus leads to the coexistence of the weak competitor. In high resource productivity environment all the species can coexist.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 1073-1076)

Pages:

1178-1181

Citation:

Online since:

December 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Levine J.M. & HilleRisLambers J.: Nature, Vol. 461 (2009), pp.254-257.

Google Scholar

[2] Hardin G.: Science, Vol. 131 (1960), pp.1292-1297.

Google Scholar

[3] Armstrong R.A. & McGehee R.: The American Naturalist, Vol. 115 (1980), p.151.

Google Scholar

[4] Hutchinson G.E.: The American Naturalist, Vol. 95 (1961), pp.137-145.

Google Scholar

[5] Tilman D.: Resource competition and community structure ( Princeton University Press 1982).

Google Scholar

[6] Huisman J. & Weissing F.J.: Nature, Vol. 402 (1999), pp.407-410.

Google Scholar

[7] Roy S. & Chattopadhyay J.: Ecological Complexity, Vol. 4 (2007), pp.26-33.

Google Scholar

[8] Chesson P. & Kuang J.J.: Nature, Vol. 456 (2008), pp.235-238.

Google Scholar

[9] Chase J.M. & Abrams P.A.: Ecology Letters, Vol. 5 (2002), pp.302-315.

Google Scholar

[10] Brose U. & Berlow E.L.: Ecology Letters, Vol. 8 (2005), pp.1317-1325.

Google Scholar

[11] Hulot F.D. & Loreau M.: Theoretical Population Biology, Vol. 69 (2006), pp.48-66.

Google Scholar

[12] Holt R.D.: Theoretical Population Biology, Vol. 12 (1977), pp.197-229.

Google Scholar

[13] Holt R.D. & Grover J.: The American Naturalist, Vol. 144 (1994), p.741.

Google Scholar

[14] Leibold M.A.: The American Naturalist, Vol. 147 (1996), p.784.

Google Scholar

[15] Chase J.M. & Leibold M.A.: Evolutionary Ecology, Vol. 14 (2000), pp.289-314.

Google Scholar

[16] Brose U.: Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Vol. 275 (2008), pp.2507-2514.

Google Scholar

[17] Janzen D.H.: The American Naturalist, Vol. 104 (1970), pp.501-528.

Google Scholar

[18] Grover J.P. & Holt R.D.: Journal Of Theoretical Biology, Vol. 191 (1998), pp.353-376.

Google Scholar

[19] Grover J.P.: Journal Of Theoretical Biology, Vol. 214 (2002), pp.599-618.

Google Scholar