Performance Appraisal of Eco-Environment Protection in Zhejiang Province Based on Entropy Weight Method

Hai Su Yu; Ji Bin Xue; Ke Jing Jia; Fan Qi

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1073-1076.1182

Paper Titles

Development and Evaluation of the Sustainable Management Index System for Fujian Coastal Shelterbelt
p.1162

Evaluation of the Eco-Environmental Quality and its Index-Induced Influencing Factors in the Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration
p.1166

Research on Ecological Function Regionalization Based on the Ecological Service Function - Take Shenzhen River and Xinzhou River Estuarine Wetland for Example
p.1171

Species Coexistence in Ecosystems with Specialist Predation: Trophic Regulation in Gradients of Resource Productivity
p.1178

Performance Appraisal of Eco-Environment Protection in Zhejiang Province Based on Entropy Weight Method
p.1182

Evaluating the Impacts of Rapid Urbanization on the Ecosystem Services of Cities in Circum-Bohai Sea Region - A Case Study of Yantai City
p.1188

Industrial Organization Pattern Based on Comprehensive Benefit of the Ecologically Fragile Region in the West of China
p.1196

On Manufacturers’ Strategies for Green Production an Example of the Copper Clad Laminate Industry
p.1203

Review of Venture Capital Investing in Clean-Tech Industry from the Perspective of Policy Preferences
p.1208

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vols. 1073-1076Performance Appraisal of Eco-Environment...

Performance Appraisal of Eco-Environment Protection in Zhejiang Province Based on Entropy Weight Method

Abstract:

According to water environment protection, protection of the atmospheric environment, solid waste disposal, and improvement of ecological environment to construct performance appraisal index system of eco-environment protection. Take Zhejiang as an example, researched on the Performance appraisal of eco-environment protection from 2006 to 2012 based on entropy weight method. The results of this assessment were in good correspondence to the regional actual situations, indicating that entropy weight method was applicable and feasible in this field. Using entropy weight method to determine the weights of assessment indices could resolve the problem of many indices not having unique standard, reduce the disturbance of subjectivity in the course of assessment, and reflect the contribution of each index to regional eco-environment protection more objectively. This method offered a new research means to quantitatively assess eco-environment protection, and have certain practical value and popularization meaning in the related fields.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Environmental Protection and Resource Utilization IV

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 1073-1076)

Pages:

1182-1187

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1073-1076.1182

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

December 2014

Authors:

Hai Su Yu, Ji Bin Xue*, Ke Jing Jia, Fan Qi

Keywords:

Eco-Environment Protection, Entropy Weight Method, Performance Appraisal, Zhejiang Province

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] Cai xiuJin. Thinking on establishing government performance evaluation system of environment protection. Chinese Joural of Environmental Management. 2013. Vol. 5. (4): 62-65.

Google Scholar

[2] Guo xianguang. Application of Improved Entropy method in evaluation of economic result. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice. 1998. Vol. 12: 98-103.

Google Scholar

[3] Wang xiaoning, bi jun. Performance based study on institutional capacity of local environmental protection bureau. China Environment Science. 2006. Vol. 26(3): 380-384.

Google Scholar

[4] Lin ye xing, Pan tieshan. Study on performance evaluation index systeim of environmental protection guiding capital of Jiangsu province. Pollution Control Technology. 2014. Vol. 27(1): 55-57.

Google Scholar

[5] Rowland-Jones, Rhys, Meinwen Pryde & Malcolm Cresser. An evaluation of current environmental management systems as indicators of environmental performance. Management of Environmental Quality. 2005, Vol. 16(3): 211-219.

DOI: 10.1108/14777830510591642

Google Scholar