Physical Simulation Experiment Research of Air Foam Flooding in Da Gang Oilfield

Article Preview

Abstract:

Air foam flooding is an important means in tertiary oil recovery. As of July 2013, in the case of low recovery degree, Da Gang oilfield has entered high water cut period, thus increasing of recovery is under pressure. This experiment simulated the actual reservoir temperature and pressure, through the establishment of physical model, implemented a series of contrast tests, systematically evaluated four variable parameters, including gas liquid ratio, injection mode, permeability, and injection speed. Experimental results has cleared the effect of variable parameters on air foam flooding, so as to provide guidance for oilfield production.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 1073-1076)

Pages:

2335-2344

Citation:

Online since:

December 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Bond, D.C. and Holbrook, C.C. 1958. Gas Drive Oil Recovery Process. US Patent No. 2, 866, 507.

Google Scholar

[2] Pascual M, Crosta D, Lacentre P. et a1. Air injection into a mature water flooded light oil reservoir; Laboratory and simulation results for Barrancas Field, Argentina[R]. SPE 94092, (2005).

DOI: 10.2118/94092-ms

Google Scholar

[3] Ren S R, Greaves M, Rathbone RR. Air injection LTO progress:An IOR technique for-oil reservoirs[J]. SPE Journal, 2002, 7(1): 90~99.

DOI: 10.2118/57005-pa

Google Scholar

[4] Greaves M, Ren S R, Xia T X. New air injection technology for IOR operations in light and heavy oil reservoirs[R]. SPE 57295, (1999).

DOI: 10.2118/57295-ms

Google Scholar

[5] Hoefner, M.L. and Evans, E. M. 1995. CO2 Foam: Results from Four Development Field Tridals. SPE Res Eng 10(4): 273-281.

DOI: 10.2118/27787-pa

Google Scholar

[6] Patzek, T. W. 1996. Field Applications of Steam Foam for Mobility Improvement and Profile Control. SPE Res Eng 11(2). 79-85.

DOI: 10.2118/29612-pa

Google Scholar

[7] Turta, A.T. and Singhal, A. K. 1998. Field Foam Applications in Enhanced Oil Recovery Projects: Screening and Design Aspects. Paper SPE48895 presented at the International Conference and Exhibition in China, Beijing, 2-6 Novenber.

DOI: 10.2118/48895-ms

Google Scholar

[8] Awan, A.R., Teigland, R., and Kleppe, J. 2008. A Survey of North Sea Enhanced-Oil-Recovery Projects Initiated During the Years 1975-2005. SPE Res Eval & Eng 11(3): 497-512.

DOI: 10.2118/99546-pa

Google Scholar

[9] Lake, L. 1989. Enhanced Oil Recovery. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Google Scholar

[10] Schramm, L.L. ed. 1994. Foams: Fundamentals and Applications in the Petroleum Industry. Washington DC: Advances in Chemistry Series, American Chemical Society.

Google Scholar

[11] Rossen, W.R. 1996. Foams: Theory, Measurement, and Applications. In Foams in Enhanced Oil Recovery, ed. R.K. Prud'homme and S. Khan, Chapter 11, 413-464. New York City: Marcel Dekker.

DOI: 10.1201/9780203755709-11

Google Scholar

[12] Shan, D. and Rossen, W.R. 2004. Optimal Injection Strategies for Foam IOR. SPE J. 9(2): 132-150.

DOI: 10.2118/88811-pa

Google Scholar

[13] Seyed Amir Farzaneh, and Mehran Sohrabi, 2013. A Review of the Status of Foam Applications in Enhanced Oil Recovery, SPE164917.

Google Scholar

[14] Blauer, R. E., and Kohlhaas, C. A., 1974. Formation Fracturing with Foam. Fall Meeting of the Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME, Houston, Texas, USA.

Google Scholar

[15] Schramm, L.L., 1994. Foam Sensitivity to Crude Oil in Porous Media in Foams, Fundamentals and Applications in the Petroleum Industry, Schramm L.L., ed., Advances in Chemistry, Series 242, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 165-197.

DOI: 10.1021/ba-1994-0242.ch004

Google Scholar

[16] Chang, Shin-Hsien, and Grigg, Reid B., 1998. Effects of Foam Quality and flow Rate on CO2-Foam Behavior at Reservoir Conditions. SPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, Oklanhoma, USA.

DOI: 10.2118/39679-ms

Google Scholar

[17] Sohrabi, M., Henderson, G.D. and Tehrani, D.H., et al. 2000. Visualisation of Oil Recovery by Water Alternating Gas (WAG) Injection Using High Pressure Micro models–Water–Wet System. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Dallas, Texas, USA.

DOI: 10.2118/63000-ms

Google Scholar

[18] Stephenson, Derril J., Graham, Andrew G., Luhning, Richard, W., 1993. Mobility Control Experience in the Joffre Viking Miscible CO2 Flood. SPE Reservoir Engineering Journal, Vol8, No3.

DOI: 10.2118/23598-pa

Google Scholar

[19] Robie, JR, D.R., Roedell, J.W., Wackowski, R.K., 1995. Field Trial of Simultaneous Injection of CO2and Water, Rangely Weber Sand Unit, Colorado. SPE Production Operations Symposium. Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA.

DOI: 10.2118/29521-ms

Google Scholar

[20] Schramm L. L., 1994. Foam: Fundamentals and Applications in the Petroleum Industry. Advances in Chemistry, Series 242.

Google Scholar

[21] Chang, S.H., and Grigg, R.B., 1999. Effects of Foam Quality and Flow Rate on CO2-Foam Behavior at Reservoir Temperature and Pressure, Reservoir Evaluation and Engineering Journal, Vol2, No 3, 248-254.

DOI: 10.2118/56856-pa

Google Scholar

[22] Nikolov, A.D., Wasan, D.T., Huang, D.W., and Edwards, D.A., 1986. The Effect of Oil on Foam Stability: Mechanisms and Implications for Oil Displacement by Foam in Porous Media. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.

DOI: 10.2118/15443-ms

Google Scholar

[23] Friddmann, F., and Jensen, J.A., 1986. Some Parameters Influencing the Formation and Propagation of Foam in Porous Media. California Regional Meeting of Society of Petroleum Engineers. Oakland, California, USA.

DOI: 10.2118/15087-ms

Google Scholar

[24] Seyed Amir Farzaneh, Seyed Amir Farzaneh, and Mehran Sohrabi, 2013. A Review of the Status of Foam Applications in Enhanced Oil Recovery. Centre for Enhanced Oil Recovery and CO2 Solutions, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK.

DOI: 10.2118/164917-ms

Google Scholar

[25] Djabbarah, N. F., Weber, S. L, Freeman, D.C., Muscateloo, J.A., and Covington, T.E., 1990. Laboratory Design and Field Demonstration of Steam Diversion with Foam. The 60th California Regional Meeting, Ventura, California, USA.

DOI: 10.2118/20067-ms

Google Scholar

[26] Bertin, H. J.; Apaydin, O.G., Castanier, L.M., and Kovscek, A.R., 1998. Foam Flow in Heterogeneous Porous Media: Effect of Crossflow. SPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.

DOI: 10.2118/39678-ms

Google Scholar

[27] Tsau, J. S., and Heller, J. P., 1996. How Can Selective Mobility Reduction of CO2-Foam Assist in Reservoir Floods. The Permian Basin Oil and Gas Recovery Conference, Midland, Texas, USA.

DOI: 10.2118/35168-ms

Google Scholar