A Study on the Sustainability of Chinese Pasturing and Semi-Pasturing Grassland Based on Ecological Footprint Model

Article Preview

Abstract:

China is a prairie giant, where available grassland area of pasturing and semi-pasturing areas account for 61.5% of national total grassland area. As China is paying more and more attention to ecological environment construction, pasturing and semi-pasturing areas become the key areas of grassland ecological protection, and the grassland sustainability status is attracting more and more attention. Based on ecological footprint model in this study, the relevant data from 2006 to 2013 are used for empirical analysis on per capita ecological footprint and per capita ecological carrying capacity of Chinese pasturing and semi-pasturing grassland. Results show that since 2006, per capita ecological footprint demand of Chinese pasturing and semi-pasturing grassland shows a small growth, while per capita ecological carrying capacity falls slightly. The pasturing and semi-pasturing areas generally present a sustainable development situation, and the per capita ecological surplus of grassland shows an overall growth, but falls slightly over the last two years. Therefore, it is still required to further strengthen the ecological protection of Chinese pasturing and semi-pasturing grassland.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 1073-1076)

Pages:

2578-2582

Citation:

Online since:

December 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Wang Nan, Yin Qi. Study on ecological city construction in Zhengzhou based on ecological footprint model [J]. Environmental Protection Science, 2014, 2: 67-71.

Google Scholar

[2] Gong Jianwen, Zhang Zhengdong. Quantitative evaluationon regional sustainable development based on ecological footprint model-a case of Dongyuan County, Dongjiang Basin[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences 2009, 18(5): 1844-1850.

Google Scholar

[3] Li Yingchao. Sustainable study on Henan cropland based on ecological footprint model [J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2009, 37(29): 14288-14289.

Google Scholar

[4] Wackernagel M, Onisto L, Bello P, et al. National natural capital accounting with the ecological footprint concept[J]. Ecological Economics, 1999, 29(3): 375-390.

DOI: 10.1016/s0921-8009(98)90063-5

Google Scholar

[5] Stefan Gossling, Carina BorgstromHansson, OliverHorstmeier et a1. Ecological Footprint analysis as a tool to assess tourism ustainability[J]. Ecological Economics, 2002. 43(2-3): 199211.

Google Scholar