Production Process and Heat Transfer Performance of 10/316 Clad Tube

Article Preview

Abstract:

A new preparation technique of carbon steel/stainless steel clad tube was introduced, and the contact surface was well combined. Meanwhile, with the using of tube heat exchanger, the experiment on the heat transfer performance of the clad tube was done. Comparing the 10/316 clad tube and the 316 stainless steel tube, the effects on the heat transfer performance of 316 stainless steel tube attached to carbon steel was evaluated. It is showed that overall heat transfer coefficient of 10/316 clad tubes is higher than that of stainless steel tube. The average heat transfer coefficient of 10/316 clad tubes is about 18.7%~34.4% higher than that of stainless steel tube. Experimental investigation indicates that, by brazing and cold drawing, the 10/316 clad tube was well combined and the thermal conductivity was better than that of stainless steel tube.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

270-274

Citation:

Online since:

December 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] D.B. Miracle. Metal matrix composites-From science to technology significance. Composites Science and Technology. Vol. 65(2005), 2526-2540.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.05.027

Google Scholar

[2] Xi Zhenghai. Domestic and international bimetal composite pipe production process. Sichuan metallurgy, Vol. 4(1989), 52-57.

Google Scholar

[3] Li Weiwei. The application of clad tube heat exchanger. Henan Chemistry, 2011 (11), 29-31.

Google Scholar

[4] Findik F. Recent developments in explosive welding. Mater Des 32(2011)1081-93.

Google Scholar

[5] Cheng Tingyu. The hot rolling and characteristics of stainless steel and carbon steel composing. Shanghai metal, 31(2009): 48-50.

Google Scholar

[6] Li Yuhe, Gou Shuyun, Deng Gang. Microstructure and properties of stainless steel composite pipe. Special casting and nonferrous alloys, (31)(2011).

Google Scholar

[7] Guo Xunzhong, Tao Jie, et al. Effects of the inner mould Material on the aluminium-316L stainless steel explosive clad pipe, Materials and Design 49(2013)116-122.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.02.001

Google Scholar

[8] Luo Z.X. Comparative study and numerical simulation of shell and tube heat exchangers, In: dissertation Huazhong University of Science and Technology, (2008).

Google Scholar

[9] Chen M.H. The principle of Chemical Engineering, Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, (2006).

Google Scholar

[10] Pawan Singh Kathait, Anil Kumar Patil. Thermo-hydraulic performance of a heat exchanger tube with discrete corrugations. Applied Thermal Engineering, 66(2014)162-170.

DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2014.01.069

Google Scholar

[11] Toshimichi Fukuoka, Masataka Nomura. Evaluation of Thermal Contact Resistance at the Interface of Dissimilar Materials. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, Vol. 135(2013).

DOI: 10.1115/1.4007958

Google Scholar

[12] NasrM. R. Jafari, Behfar, R. A novel design for evaporative fluid coolers, Applied Thermal Engneering, 30(2010), 2746-2752.

DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2010.07.030

Google Scholar

[13] Yi Jiang, Xiaoyun Xie. Theoretical and testing performance of an innovative indirect evaporative chiller. Solar Energy, 84(2010), 2041-(2055).

DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2010.09.012

Google Scholar