Anode-Cathode Position: How it Influences the Radiation Risk to Staff Involved in Fluoroscopy Procedures

Article Preview

Abstract:

It is important to understand that the heel effect contributes higher dose to cathode bound. This study is to verify this effect and consequently utilized it to minimize the radiation dose to staff involved in fluoroscopy procedures especially those using mobile C-arm unit. Water phantom with size of 20 x 30 x 30 cm was used in this study. It was exposed to x-rays from a mobile C-arm unit with auto brightness control (ABC) function. An ion chamber and a solid state detector were used to measure the scattered radiation and primary beam profile. Based on the result it was clear that scattered radiation measured was highest on the cathode bound side. Hence personnel involves in fluoroscopy procedure should avoid or spend the least possible time within this cathode bound area in order to lessen the radiation risk.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

405-409

Citation:

Online since:

February 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] N.A. Sidi Ahmad. Legislative Requirement in Medical. Lecture note for Training Course on X-Ray for General Practitioner, Nuclear Malaysia Training Center. Feb 17 (2014).

Google Scholar

[2] D.L. Miller. Interventional Fluoroscopy; Reducing Radiation Risks for Patients and Staff. J Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 20 (2009) S274.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2009.04.057

Google Scholar

[3] J. J. Germano, G. Day, D.Gregorious, V.Natarajan and T. Cohen. A Novel Radiation Protection Drape Reduces Radiation Exposure during Fluoroscopy-Guided Electrophysiology Procedures. J Invasive Cardiology. 17 (2005) 469-472.

Google Scholar

[4] T. Mearon and P.C. Brennan. Anode Heel Effects In Thoracic Radiology: A Visual Grading Analysis", Proc. SPIE 6142, Medical Imaging, Physics of Medical Imaging. 61423D (2006).

DOI: 10.1117/12.641623

Google Scholar

[5] J.Mandell. Core Radiology. Cambridge University Press, 2013.

Google Scholar

[6] H. Salleh, M. K. Matori, M. J. M. Isa, Z. Jamaluddin, M. F. A.Rahman and M. K. M. Zin. Distance Factor on Reducing Scattered Radiation Risk during Interventional Fluoroscopy, Presented at Nuclear Malaysia R&D Seminar (2012).

Google Scholar

[7] B.W. Long, E.D. Frank, R.A. Ehrlich. Radiography Essentials for Limited Practice. Elsevier Health Science, 2012.

Google Scholar