Quality Cost Analysis of Typical Forging Based on SPC and DEA Model

Article Preview

Abstract:

In order to control the quality costs of forgings efficiently and ensure the optimization of enterprise production value input and benefit output, using piston, output shaft and other typical forgings as application objects, choosing cold and warm forging process instead of the former single hot forging or cold forging process, reinforcing Statistical Process Control (SPC) of processing quality and appropriately distributing quality failure cost and quality assurance cost in order to efficiently match the total cost of quality, quality process capacity index and production program so that the stability of forging quality can be improved. Using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) to contrast and analysis the quality cost data of new process and old process, of which the result shows that the technical input and benefit output of new process accord with mass production requirements in the prior period of enterprise industrialization.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

808-815

Citation:

Online since:

March 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Sim H K, Khaled O M, Kong Jackie Y J, et al. Cost of quality for an automotive industry: a survey and findings. International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management, 2009, 17(4): 437-452.

DOI: 10.1504/ijmtm.2009.023960

Google Scholar

[2] Xu B S, DONG S Y, SHI P J. States and prospects of china characterised quality guarantee technology system for remanufactured parts. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2013, 49(20): 84-90(in Chinese).

DOI: 10.3901/jme.2013.20.084

Google Scholar

[3] Chin K S, Duan G, Tang X. A computer-integrated framework for global quality chain management. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2006, 27(2): 547-560.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-004-2202-8

Google Scholar

[4] Pham D T, Waini M A. Feature-based control chart pattern recognition. International Journal of Production Research, 1997, 35(7): 1875-1890.

DOI: 10.1080/002075497194967

Google Scholar

[5] Liu D Y, Jiang P Y, Zhang Y F. An e-quality control model for multistage machining processes of workpieces. Science in China Series E: Technological Sciences, 2008, 51(12): 2178-2194.

DOI: 10.1007/s11431-008-0240-4

Google Scholar

[6] Ni M, Xu X F, Deng S C. Extended QFD and data-mining-based methods for supplier selection in mass customization. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 2007, 20(2-3): 280-291.

DOI: 10.1080/09511920601150651

Google Scholar

[7] Chen Y, Jin J H. Quality-reliability chain modeling for system-reliability analysis of complex manufacturing process. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 2005, 54( 3): 475-488.

DOI: 10.1109/tr.2005.853441

Google Scholar

[8] ZHANG G X. Quality management. Bei jing: Higher Education Press, 1998(in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[9] Bai B G, Sun Z. Quality cost decision-making theory. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press, 2012(in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[10] Guh R S. Integrating artificial intelligence into on-line statistical process control. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 2003, l9(1): 1-20.

DOI: 10.1002/qre.510

Google Scholar

[11] Yang J H, Yang M S. A control chart pattern recognition system using a statistical correlation coefficient method. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2005, 48(2): 205-221.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2005.01.008

Google Scholar

[12] Wang P, Zhang D H, Li S, et al. Machining error control by integrating multivariate statistical process control and stream of variations methodology. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2012, 25(6): 937-947.

DOI: 10.1016/s1000-9361(11)60465-2

Google Scholar

[13] Premachandra I M, Bhabra G S, Sueyoshi T. DEA as a tool for bankruptcy assessment: a comparative study with logistic regression technique. European Journal of Operational Research, 2009, 193(2): 412-424.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2007.11.036

Google Scholar

[14] Ali A I, Lerme C S, Seiford L M. Components of efficiency evaluation in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 1995, 80(3): 462-473.

DOI: 10.1016/0377-2217(94)00131-u

Google Scholar

[15] Quan L W, Hong Y, Lu J S. The necessary and sufficient conditions for returns to scale properties in generalized data envelopment analysis model. Science in China Series E: Technological Sciences, 2011, 54(4): 831-844.

Google Scholar