Influence of Slag on Water Resistance of Magnesia Phosphate Cement

Article Preview

Abstract:

Effect of different curing conditions on the mechanical properties of magnesium phosphate cement (MPC), and the water resistance of MPC was improved by adding slag, the influence of slag on component and microstructure of the hydrated product were studied in this paper. The additive amount of slag was 0% ,10% , 20%, 30% and 40% separately in the ratio of total amount of MPC. It indicates that the compressive strength and flexural strength increase by about 30%,40% when the amount of slag reaches 10% of phosphate cement, respectively , and the dissolution of some phosphate which has not reacted can be prevented when cured in water for days, it improves the pH value of the solution, so the main hydration product-MgKPO4·6H2O hard to be dissolved under alkaline environment resulting in the decreasing of porosity ,and the decrease of strength would be controlled.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

387-391

Citation:

Online since:

April 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Sarkar A K. Phosphate cement-based fast-setting binders[J]. Ceramic Bulletion, 1990, 69(2): 234-238.

Google Scholar

[2] Sugama T, Kukacka L E. Magnesium monophosphate cements derived from diammonium phosphate solutions [J]. Cement Concrete Res, 1983, 13(3): 407.

DOI: 10.1016/0008-8846(83)90041-8

Google Scholar

[3] LI Dong-xu, LI Peng-xiao, FENG Chun-hua Research on Water Resistance of Magnesium Phosphate Cement [J]. TOURNAL OF BUILDING MATERIALS, 2009, 12(5): 505.

Google Scholar

[4] WANG Hongtao, QIAN Jueshi WANG Jianguo, Review of Magnesia-phosphte Cement[J]. Materials Review, 2005, 19(12): 46.

Google Scholar

[5] HOU Lei, LI Jin-hong and WANG Hao-lin. Mechanical property and hydration mechanism of slag blended magnesium phosphate cement[J]. ACTA PET ROLOGICA ET MINERALOGICA, 2011, 30(4): 721-726.

Google Scholar