Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Lignocellulosic Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunch (EFB)

Article Preview

Abstract:

A preliminary study was performed on enzymatic hydrolysis process for treating empty fruit bunch (EFB) fibre. The bioconversion of cellulose hydrolysis was carried out with soluble cellulase from Trichoderma reesei as the biocatalyst. Crucial trends such as substrate and enzyme loading influencing the enzymatic reaction were also studied in order to enhance the cellulose conversion. The results indicate that as the enzyme loading was increased, the EFB conversion also increased until it reached 115.63 FPU/g of enzyme concentration, beyond this values, the reverse occurred. On the other hand, as the substrate loading was increased the conversion decreased. Inhibition of enzyme adsorption by hydrolysis products appear to be the main cause of the decreasing conversion at increasing enzyme loading and substrate loading.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

305-310

Citation:

Online since:

July 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] F. Hamzah, A. Idris, T.K. Shuan, Preliminary study on enzymatic hydrolysis of treated oil palm (Elaies) empty fruit bunch fibre (EFB) by using combination of cellulose and β 1-4 glucosidase. Biomass and Bioengineering. 35 (2011) 1055-1059.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.11.020

Google Scholar

[2] Y. Sun, J. Cheng, Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials for ethanol production: a review. Bioresour Technol. 83 (2002). 1-11.

Google Scholar

[3] M. Galbe, G. Zacchi, A review of the production of ethanol from softwood. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 59 (2002) 618-28.

DOI: 10.1007/s00253-002-1058-9

Google Scholar

[4] M. Mandels, E.T. Reese, Inhibition of cellulases and β-glucosidases. In: Reese ET (ed) Advances in enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose and related materials. Pergamon, London. (1963) p.115–157.

DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-08-009947-7.50011-6

Google Scholar

[5] A. Chesson, The maceration of linen flax under anaerobic conditions. J. Appl. Bacteriol. (1978) 45: 219.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1978.tb04217.x

Google Scholar

[6] T.K. Ghose, Measurement of cellulase activities. Pure Appl Chem. (1987) 59: 257-68.

Google Scholar

[7] A.A. Astimar, M. Husin, M. Anis, Preparation of cellulose from oil palm empty fruit bunches via ethanol digestion: effect of acid and alkali catalysts. J Oil Palm Res. 14 (2002) 9-14.

Google Scholar

[8] H. Ma, W.W. Liu, X. Chen, X.J. Wu, Z.L. Yu, Enhanced enzymatic saccharification of rice straw by microwave pretreatment. Bioresour Technol. (2009) 100: 1279-84.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.08.045

Google Scholar

[9] T. Rezanka, K. Sigler, Biologically active compounds of semi-metals. ChemInform. 39 (2008) 585-606.

DOI: 10.1002/chin.200822264

Google Scholar

[10] F. Carrillo, M.J. Lis, X. Colom, M. Lo ́ pez-Mesas and J. Valldeperas. Effect of alkali pretreatment on cellulase hydrolysis of wheat straw: Kinetic study. (2005) Process Biochem. 40: 3360 – 3364.

DOI: 10.1016/j.procbio.2005.03.003

Google Scholar

[11] C. Martin, G. J. d. M. Rocha, , J. R. A. d. Santos, , M. C. d. Albuqurque and, E.R. Gouveia Enzyme Loading Dependence of Cellulose Hydrolysis of sugarcane bagasse (2012) Quim. Nova. 35 (10) 1927 – (1930).

DOI: 10.1590/s0100-40422012001000007

Google Scholar

[12] L. Rosgard, P. Andric, K. Dam-Johansen, S. Pedersen and A.S. Meyer. Effects of substrate loading on enzymatic hydrolysis and viscosity of pre-treated barley straw. (2007) Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 143 (1); 27 – 40.

DOI: 10.1007/s12010-007-0028-1

Google Scholar

[13] Y. Zhao, B. Wu, B. Yan, P. Gao, Mechanism of cellobiose inhibition in cellulose hydrolysis by cellobiohydrolase. Sci Chin Ser C Life Sci. 47 (2004) 18–24.

DOI: 10.1360/02yc0163

Google Scholar

[14] T.S. Khaw, and A.B. Ariff (2009) Optimization of enzymatic saccharification of palm oil mill effluent solid and oil palm fruit fiber to fermentable sugars. J. Trop. Agric. And Fd. Sci. 37 (1): Page 85- 94.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123723

Google Scholar

[15] V. Rani, S. Mohanram, R. Tiwari, L. Nain, and A. Arora (2014) J. Bioprocess. Biotech. 5: 197 doi: 10. 4172/2155-9821. 1000197.

Google Scholar

[16] S. Shahbazi, H. Askari, T. Naseripour, M. Moosavi-Nasab and, M. Bakhtiyari (2014).

Google Scholar

[17] Y. C. Ching and T. S. Ng (2014) Effect of Preparation Conditions on Cellulose from Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunch Fiber. Bioresources. 9 (4), 6373 – 6385.

DOI: 10.15376/biores.9.4.6373-6385

Google Scholar