Effect of Fluid Invasion to Formation Resistivity

Article Preview

Abstract:

Clay is the primary cause for resistivity reduction in most of the low resistivity pay cases. While dry clay acts as insulator, reaction with water made wet clay a good conductor. Clay conductivity is contributed by the exchangeable cation properties of the mineral. This reduces the actual resistivity of the formation, especially in the invaded zone. The effect is more severe if clay existed as dispersed type in the formation; which will also reduce other important petrophysical properties such as porosity and permeability. The study was conducted to observe the mechanism and reduction of formation resistivity due to mud invasion and find the relationship between resistivity reduction and petrophysical properties of the formation. The resistivity was measured on four types of samples with different grain size and sorting; well sorted fine grain size, well sorted medium grain size, well sorted coarse grain size and not well sorted sand. Three types of fluids were flushed into sand pack those are brine, crude oil and water based mud to simulate the invasion process. Sand pack with not well sorted sand and fine grain size had the most resistivity reduction, which possibly due to the high clay content that interacted with water.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

285-295

Citation:

Online since:

July 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Anderson, Barbara Ina. (2011). Modeling and Inversion Methods for the Interpretation of Resistivity Logging Tool Response. B. Sc., Western Connecticut State University geboren te Danbury, Connecticut, USA.

Google Scholar

[2] Austin Boyd, Bod Davis Allan Sibbit. The Lowdown On Low Resisvity Pay.

Google Scholar

[3] J. D. Klein and P. R. Martin, D. F. Allen. (June 26-29, 1995).

Google Scholar

[4] The Petrophysics Of Electrically Anisotropic Reservoirs. SPWLA 36th Annual Logging Symposium.

Google Scholar

[5] G.M. Hamada, M.N.J. Al-Awad King Saud University. Petrophysical Evaluation of Low Resistivity Sandstone Reservoirs.

Google Scholar

[6] Pal Skalle. Drilling fluid engineering book. 2011 ISBN 978-87-7681-929-3.

Google Scholar

[7] Physical Properties. Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering 2013 Vol III WCE 2013, July 3 - 5, 2013, London, U. K.

Google Scholar

[8] Physical Properties. Physical Properties. Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering 2013 Vol III WCE 2013, July 3 - 5, 2013, London, U. K.

Google Scholar

[9] Preeti Sagar Nayak* And B K Singh. Instrumental characterization of clay by XRF, XRD and FTIR. Department of Chemistry, Govt. M.H. College of Home Science and Science for Women, Jabalpur 482 002, India.

Google Scholar

[10] J. A. de Waal, R. M. M. Smits, J. D. de Graaf, B. A. Schipper. Measurement and Evaluation of Resistivity-Index Curves. Koninklijke/Shell Exploratie en Produktie Laboratorium, Rijswijk, The Netherlands.

Google Scholar

[11] IARC (1997). Silica, some silicates, coal dust and pararamid fibrils. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum, 68: 1–475.

Google Scholar

[12] Narve Aske. Characterisation of Crude Oil Components, Asphaltene Aggregation and Emulsion Stabilityby means of Near Infrared Spectroscopyand Multivariate Analysis. Department of Chemical Engineering Norwegian University of Science and Technology Trondheim, June (2002).

Google Scholar

[13] Pal Skalle. Drilling fluid engineering 2011 ISBN 978-87-7681-929-3.

Google Scholar