Energy Cost Optimization in High Speed Hard Turning Using Simulated Annealing Algorithm

Muataz Hazza F. Al Hazza; Erry Y.T. Adesta; Muhammad Hasibul Hasan; Norhashimah Mohd Shaffiar

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1115.104

Paper Titles

Preliminary Study: The Effect of Tool Engagement and Cutting Speed on Cutting Temperature during Contour Tool Path Strategy
p.86

Surface Roughness in Drilled Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) Composite Using Diamond Coated Ball-Nose Drills
p.90

Tool Wear during Milling Laminated Carbon Fibre Reinforced Plastic
p.96

Magnetic Damping in Turning of Stainless Steel AISI 304 for the Reduction of Machining Vibration and Tool Wear
p.100

Energy Cost Optimization in High Speed Hard Turning Using Simulated Annealing Algorithm
p.104

Finite Element Modeling of Clinching Process for Joining Dissimilar Materials
p.109

Multi Objective Optimisation for High Speed End Milling Using Simulated Annealing Algorithm
p.113

Optimization of Tool Wear Using Coupled RSM-GA Approach in Turning of Stainless Steel AISI 304 with Magnetic Damping of Tool Shank
p.117

Surface Roughness Prediction in High Speed End Milling Using Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System
p.122

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vol. 1115Energy Cost Optimization in High Speed Hard...

Energy Cost Optimization in High Speed Hard Turning Using Simulated Annealing Algorithm

Abstract:

Selecting the cutting conditions to optimize the economics of machining process as assessed by energy machining cost is essential. The aim of this research is to determine the optimum cutting parameters that minimize the energy cost needed for removing one cubic centimetre of material in High Speed Hard Turning (HSHT) process. To achieve that, a set of experimental machining data to cut hardened steel AISI 4340 was obtained with different ranges of cutting speed, feed rate, depth of cut and negative rake angle using mixed ceramic as a cutting tool. Regression models have been developed by using Box-Behnken design as a design of experiment. Then, the Simulated Annealing Algorithm (SAA) has been used to optimize the cutting parameters. The data collected was statistically modelled. The results show that the range of minimum energy cost to remove one cubic centimetre of material for the three techniques can be achieved in the range of 300 to 308 as a cutting speed, -12 for cutting rake angle, 0.125 as a feed rate and 0.15 as a depth of cut.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Advances in Manufacturing and Materials Engineering

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volume 1115)

Pages:

104-108

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1115.104

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

July 2015

Authors:

Muataz Hazza F. Al Hazza, Erry Y.T. Adesta, Muhammad Hasibul Hasan, Norhashimah Mohd Shaffiar

Keywords:

Energy Cost, HSHT, Optimization, Simulated Annealing

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] R. Quiza Sardiñas, M. Rivas Santana & E. Alfonso Brindis (2006). Genetic algorithm-based multi-objective optimization of cutting parameters in turning processes. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 19(2), 127-133.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engappai.2005.06.007

Google Scholar

[2] N. Ahmad, T. Tanaka, & Y. Saito, (2011). Optimization of multipass turning parameters by genetic algorithm. Advanced Materials Research, 264, 1545-1550.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.264-265.1545

Google Scholar

[3] M. Hrelja, S., KlancnikIrgolic, T., Paulic, M., Jurkovic, Z., Balic, J., & Brezocnik, M. (2014). Particle swarm optimization approach for modelling a turning process. electronic form only: NE.

DOI: 10.14743/apem2014.1.173

Google Scholar

[4] R. Venkata Rao, & V. D. Kalyankar, (2013). Multi-pass turning process parameter optimization using teaching–learning-based optimization algorithm. Scientia Iranica, 20(3), 967-974.

DOI: 10.1016/j.scient.2013.01.002

Google Scholar

[5] S. Kara, & W. Li, (2011). Unit process energy consumption models for material removal processes. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, 60(1), 37-40.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2011.03.018

Google Scholar

[6] R. K. Bhushan, (2013). Optimization of cutting parameters for minimizing power consumption and maximizing tool life during machining of Al alloy SiC particle composites. Journal of Cleaner Production, 39, 242-254.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.08.008

Google Scholar

[7] A. Aggarwal, H. Singh, P. Kumar, & M. Singh, (2008). Optimizing power consumption for CNC turned parts using response surface methodology and Taguchi's technique—a comparative analysis. Journal of materials processing technology, 200(1), 373-384.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.09.041

Google Scholar

[8] M. F. Rajemi, P. T. Mativenga, & A. Aramcharoen, (2010). Sustainable machining: selection of optimum turning conditions based on minimum energy considerations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(10), 1059-1065.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.01.025

Google Scholar

[9] M.F., Rajemi, P.T., Mativenga & S.I. Jaffery, 2009. Energy and carbon footprint analysis for machining titanium Ti-6Al-4V Alloy. Journal of Machine Engineering 9 (1), 103–112.

Google Scholar

[10] M.H.F. Al Hazza, E Y T Adesta, Riza, M., & Suprianto, M. Y. (2012). Power Consumption Optimization in CNC Turning Process Using Multi Objective Genetic Algorithm. Advanced Materials Research, 576, 95-98.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.576.95

Google Scholar

[11] E.Y. T, Adesta, & M.H.F. Al Hazza, (2011). Machining Time Simulation in High Speed Hard Turning. Advanced Materials Research, 264, 1102-1106.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.264-265.1102

Google Scholar

[12] Kirkpatrick, S. (1984). Optimization by simulated annealing: Quantitative studies. Journal of statistical physics, 34(5-6), 975-986.

DOI: 10.1007/bf01009452

Google Scholar

[13] S. Kirkpatrick; C. D. Gelatt; M. P. Vecchi (1983). Optimization by simulated annealing. science, 220(4598), 671-680.

DOI: 10.1126/science.220.4598.671

Google Scholar