Green Polyurethane Adhesives for Wood Bonding

Article Preview

Abstract:

The Green polyurethane adhesive system was prepared using two types palm oil polyol having different molecular weight ~1100 (GA) and ~ 2200 (GB) respectively, 4-4-diphenylmethane diisocyanate (MDI) and nanoclay fillers via in-situ process. Adhesives were applied on both sides of two untreated wood substrate using brushing technique for lap shear test. The attached substrate then undergoes the curing process for 24 hours at room temperature with relative humidity of 50±5%. The disappearance of NCO peak in the Fourier transform infra-red (FTIR) spectrum showed that MDI has completely reacted to form PU. Contact angle measurement proved that high wetting condition obtains from green polyurethane (PU) adhesive. PU adhesive wood joint improved in shear strength with addition of 1wt% nanoclay for both green polyol.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

331-336

Citation:

Online since:

July 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] K. H. Badri, A. H. Ujar, Z. Othman & F. H. Sahaldin. 2006. Shear strength of wood to wood adhesive based on palm kernel oil. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 100(3): 1759 - 1764.

DOI: 10.1002/app.23015

Google Scholar

[2] C. Wayakron Phetphaisit, R. Bumee, J. Namahoot, J. Ruamcharoen, P. Ruamcharoen. 2013. Polyurethane polyester elastomer: Innovative environmental friendly wood adhesive from modified PETs and hydroxyl liquid natural rubber polyols. International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives, 41: 127–131.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2012.11.007

Google Scholar

[3] S. Chuayjuljit, T. Sangpakdee & O. Saravari. 2007. Processing and Properties of Palm Oil-Based Rigid Polyurethane Foam. Journal of Metals, Materials and Minerals, 17(1): 17-23.

Google Scholar

[4] Z. K. S. Norin, T. L. Ooi. & A. Salmiah. 2006. Production of moulded palm-based flexible polyurethane foams. Journal of Oil Palm Research. 18: 198-203.

Google Scholar

[5] Bernama. (2009, October 29). Government to Establish National Innovation Centre. Retrieve from: http: /www. pmo. gov. my.

Google Scholar

[6] Z. Petrovic, I. Javni, A. Guo & W. Zhang. 2004. Method of making natural oil based polyols and polyurethanes therefrom. United States Patent.

Google Scholar

[7] C. Wang, Y. Wang, W. Liu, H. Yin, Z. Yuan, Q. Wang, H. Xie & R. Cheng. 2012. Natural fibrous nanoclay reinforced soy polyol-based polyurethane. Materials Letters. 78: 85–87.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2012.03.067

Google Scholar

[8] L. Kin-tak, G. Chong & H. David. 2006. A critical review on nanotube and nanotube/nanoclay related polymer composite materials. Composites: Part B. 37: 425–436.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2006.02.020

Google Scholar

[9] H. Dodiuk, I. Belinski, A. Dotan, & S. Kenig, 2006. Polyurethane adhesives containing functionalized nanoclays. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 20(12):. 1345–1355.

DOI: 10.1163/156856106778456573

Google Scholar

[10] M. A. Bhattab, J. Donate-Robles, V. Garcia-Pacios & J. Miguel Martin-Martinez. 2011. Characterization of polyurethane adhesives containing nanosilicas of different particle size. International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives. 31: 97–103.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2010.11.001

Google Scholar

[11] N. Sarier & E. Onder. 2010. Organic modification of montmorillonite with low molecular weight polyethylene glycols and its use in polyurethane nanocomposite foams. Thermochimica Acta. 510: 113–121.

DOI: 10.1016/j.tca.2010.07.004

Google Scholar

[12] C. Esposito. Corione, P. Prinari, D. Cannoletta, G. Mensitieri & A. Maffezzoli. 2008. Synthesis and characterization of clay-nanocomposite solvent-based polyurethane adhesive. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 28: 91-100.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2006.12.004

Google Scholar

[13] E. Gunister, I. Cobanoglu & I. Sevim. 2009. The effect of polyurethane on NaMt and ONaMt dispersions. Progress in Organic Coatings. 65: 357–361.

DOI: 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2009.02.005

Google Scholar

[14] X. Kong, G. Liu & J. M. Curtis. 2011. Characterization of canola oil based polyurethane wood adhesives. International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives. 31: 559–564.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2011.05.004

Google Scholar

[15] E. Sancaktar & J. Kuznicki. 2011. Nanocomposite adhesives: Mechanical behavior with nanoclay . International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives. 31: 286–300.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2010.09.006

Google Scholar

[16] Ganesh. C. Basak, Abhijit Bandyopadhyay & Anil. K. Bhowmick. 2011. Influence of nanoclay on adhesion of EPDM vulcanizate. International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives. 31: 209–219.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2011.02.001

Google Scholar

[17] U. Faheem. 2008. Clays, nanoclays, and montmorillonite minerals. Metallurgical And Materials Transactions A. 39(A): 2804- 2805.

Google Scholar

[18] K.V.P. Chakradhar, K. Venkata Subbaiah2, M. Ashok Kumar & G. Ramachandra Reddy. 2011. Epoxy/polyester blend nanocomposites: effect of nanoclay on mechanical, thermal and morphological properties. Malaysian Polymer Journal. 6(2): 109-118.

Google Scholar

[19] D.Y. Kwok & A.W. Neumann. 1999. Contact angle measurement and contact angle interpretation. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science. 81: 167-249.

DOI: 10.1016/s0001-8686(98)00087-6

Google Scholar

[20] Anon. The Clay Mineral Group, Home Page: www. mineral. galleries. com, accessed July. 20, 2014, p.1–2.

Google Scholar