New Materials Applied for the Stationary Phases in View of the Optimized HPLC and UHPLC Column Classification System Used in the Pharmaceutical Analysis

Article Preview

Abstract:

Pharmacopoeial monographs define usually requirements for the use of the particular chromatographic packing materials in a very general way. Even if a selection of particular chromatographic column packed with the defined material is suggested, it appears often that column is currently not present in the laboratory, or is no longer commercially available. With respect to those facts, there are needs to replace the given column material for another one, however with the similar physicochemical characteristics. This can be achieved by using one of the classification systems of columns’ material (e.g., the procedure developed by the researchers at the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven – and therefore called tentatively by us as KUL procedure).In the first stage of the work, it has been proven that the results obtained by KUL procedure can be related to results obtained during chemometrics verification of the suitability of selected stationary phases’ material used in the individual columns for purity test of alfuzosin as pharmaceutical substance and their impurities and related compounds. The next step was to adapt KUL procedure to allow the classification of modern and new UHPLC and Core-Shell (CS) columns’ material characterized by the novel physicochemical properties. Together, properties of 61 columns packed with variable materials have been characterized. The last step comprised the data collection to examine the possibilities to use UHPLC and CS columns materials as equivalent ones to the classical HPLC columns’ materials in view of the method transfer for the previously mentioned assay for alfuzosin.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 1120-1121)

Pages:

1404-1412

Citation:

Online since:

July 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] S.A.C. Wren, P. Tchelitcheff, Use of ultra-performance liquid chromatography in pharmaceutical development, J. Chromatogr. A, 1119 (2006) 140–146.

DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2006.02.052

Google Scholar

[2] L.R. Snyder, J.W. Dolan, P.W. Carr, The hydrophobic-subtraction model of reversed-phase column selectivity, J. Chromatogr. A 1060 (2004) 77-116.

DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9673(04)01480-3

Google Scholar

[3] M.R. Euerby, P.A. Petterson, A classification of commercially available RPLC columns - A tool for rational selection. LC-GC Europe 13 (2000) 665-677.

Google Scholar

[4] R. Kaliszan, QSRR: quantitative structure-(chromatographic) retention relationships, Chem. Rev. 107 (2007) 3212-3246.

DOI: 10.1021/cr068412z

Google Scholar

[5] A. Plenis, E. Balakowska, T. Bączek, The comparison of two column classification systems during the chromatographic analysis of steroids, J. Sep. Sci. 34 (2011) 3310-3321.

DOI: 10.1002/jssc.201100631

Google Scholar

[6] P. Dehouck, D. Visky, G. Van den Bergh, E. Haghedooren, E. Adams, A. Kerner, Y. Vander Heyden, D.L. Massart, Z. Kovács, B. Noszál, J. Hoogmartens, Facilitated column selection in reversed-phase liquid chromatography for pharmaceutical separations, LC-GC Europe 17 (2004).

DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2005.09.069

Google Scholar

[7] T. Németh, E. Haghedooren, B. Noszál, J. Hoogmartens, E. Adams, Three methods to characterize reversed phase liquid chromatographic columns applied to pharmaceutical separations, J. Chemometr. 22 (2008) 178-185.

DOI: 10.1002/cem.1108

Google Scholar

[8] S. Dragovic, E. Haghedooren, T. Nemeth, I.M. Palabiyik, J. Hoogmartens, E. Adams, Evaluation of two approaches to characterise liquid chromatographic columns using pharmaceutical separations, J. Chromatogr. A 1216 (2009) 3210-3216.

DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2009.02.023

Google Scholar

[9] J. Szulfer, A. Plenis, T. Bączek, Evaluation of a column classification method using the separation of alfuzosin from its related substances, J. Chromatogr, A 1229 (2012) 198-207.

DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2012.01.043

Google Scholar

[10] J. Szulfer, A. Plenis, T. Bączek, Application of a column classification method in a selectivity study involving caffeine and its related impurities, Talanta 99 (2012) 492-501.

DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2012.06.015

Google Scholar

[11] J. Szulfer, A. Plenis, T. Bączek, Chemometric evaluation of the column classification system during the pharmaceutical analysis of lamotrigine and its related substances, Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 405 (2013) 6529-6541.

DOI: 10.1007/s00216-013-7097-5

Google Scholar

[12] J. Szulfer, A. Plenis, T. Bączek, Comparison of core-shell and totally porous ultra high performance liquid chromatographic stationary phases based on their selectivity towards alfuzosin compounds, J. Chromatogr. A 1346 (2014) 69–77.

DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2014.04.046

Google Scholar

[13] European Pharmacopoeia (2011) 7th ed., Council of Europe, Strasbourg, France.

Google Scholar

[14] Ph. Eur. Knowledge. Database http: /extranet. edqm. eu/publications/recherches_sw. shtm.

Google Scholar