Properties of VA/E/MMA Terpolymer Powder-Modified Mortars

Article Preview

Abstract:

This study is to examine and clarify the quality of polymer-modified mortars using a VA/E/MMA terpolymer powder as compared with polymer-modified mortars using a VAE copolymer powder. Polymer-modified mortars using general commercial redispersible polymer powders are prepared with various polymer-cement ratios, and tested for flexural and compressive strengths, tensile strength, water absorption, chloride ion penetration, carbonation and pore size distribution by mercury porosimetry. Overall, the properties of polymer-modified mortars using a VA/E/MMA terpolymer powder were superior to those of polymer-modified mortars using a VAE copolymer powder. And VA/E/MMA terpolymer powder-modified mortars showed significantly improved mechanical properties and durability in comparison with unmodified mortar. It is concluded from the test results that the modification of cement mortar with redispersible polymer powder improves the properties of unmodified mortar, and VA/E/MMA terpolymer powder has higher quality than VAE copolymer powder.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

169-176

Citation:

Online since:

November 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Architectural Institute of Japan, Recommendations for Environmentally Conscious Practice of Reinforced Concrete Buildings, Architectural Institute of Japan , Tokyo, 2008. (in Japanese).

Google Scholar

[2] Ohama Y, Demura K, Kim WK, Properties of Polymer-Modified Mortars Using Redispersible Polymer Powders, Proceedings of the First East Asia Symposium on Polymers in Concrete, Chuncheon, Korea, May 2-3, 1994, 81-90.

DOI: 10.4324/9780203477151_thermal_resistance_of_polymer-modified_mortars_using

Google Scholar

[3] Mehta PK, Studies on Blended Portland Cements Containing Santorin Earth, Cement and Concrete Research, July 1981, 11(4), 507-518.

DOI: 10.1016/0008-8846(81)90080-6

Google Scholar