Performance of a Fly Ash Geopolymeric Mortar for Coating of Ordinary Portland Cement Concrete Exposed to Harsh Chemical Environments

Article Preview

Abstract:

Premature degradation of ordinary Portland cement (OPC) concrete infrastructures is a current and serious problem with overwhelming costs amounting to several trillion dollars. The use of concrete surface treatments with waterproofing materials to prevent the access of aggressive substances is an important way of enhancing concrete durability. The most common surface treatments use polymeric resins based on epoxy, silicone (siloxane), acrylics, polyurethanes or polymethacrylate. However, epoxy resins have low resistance to ultraviolet radiation while polyurethanes are sensitive to high alkalinity environments. Geopolymers constitute a group of materials with high resistance to chemical attack that could also be used for coating of concrete infrastructures exposed to harsh chemical environments.This article presents results of an experimental investigation on the resistance to chemical attack (by sulfuric and nitric acid) of several materials: OPC concrete, high performance concrete (HPC), epoxy resin, acrylic painting and a fly ash based geopolymeric mortar. Two types of acids, each with high concentrations of 10%, 20% and 30%, were used to simulate long term degradation by chemical attack. The results show that the epoxy resin had the best resistance to chemical attack, irrespective of the acid type and acid concentration.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

573-580

Citation:

Online since:

November 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] F. Glasser, J. Marchand, E. Samson, Durability of concrete, Degradation phenomena involving detrimental chemical reactions, Cem. Concr. Res. 38 (2008) 226-246.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.09.015

Google Scholar

[2] F. Pacheco-Torgal, J.P. Castro-Gomes, S. Jalali, Alkali – activated binders: a review Part 1 Historical background, terminology, reaction mechanisms and hydration products, Constr. Build. Mat. 22 (2008) 1305-1314.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.10.015

Google Scholar

[3] F. Pacheco-Torgal, Z. Abdollahnejad, S. Miraldo, S. Baklouti, Y. Ding, An overview on the potential of geopolymers for concrete infrastructure rehabilitation, Constr. Build. Mat. 36 (2012) 1053-1058.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.07.003

Google Scholar

[4] A. Almusallam, F. Khan, S. Dulaijan, O. Al-Amoudi Effectiveness of surface coatings in improving concrete durability, Cem. Concr. Comp. 25 (2003) 473–481.

DOI: 10.1016/s0958-9465(02)00087-2

Google Scholar

[5] J. Aguiar, P. Moreira, P. Lukowski, L. Czarnecki, A. Camões, D. Van Gemert Ranking procedure for polymeric coatings and hydrophobic agents for concrete protection, Restoration of Buildings and Monuments 13 (2007) 251-264.

DOI: 10.1515/rbm-2007-6143

Google Scholar

[6] J.B. Aguiar, A. Camões, P.M. Moreira, Coatings for concrete protection against aggressive environments, J. Adv. Concr. Tech. 6 (2008) 243-250.

DOI: 10.3151/jact.6.243

Google Scholar

[7] M. Berndt, Evaluation of coatings, mortars and mix design for protection of concrete against sulphur oxidising bacteria, Constr. Build. Mat. 25 (2011) 3893–3902.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.04.014

Google Scholar

[8] M. Medeiros, P. Helene, Efficacy of surface hydrophobic agents in reducing water and chloride ion penetration in concrete, Mater. Struct. 41 (2008) 59-71.

DOI: 10.1617/s11527-006-9218-5

Google Scholar

[9] F. Pacheco-Torgal, S. Jalali, Sulphuric acid resistance of plain, polymer modified, and fly ash cement concretes. Constr. Build. Mater. 23 (2009) 3485–3491.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.08.001

Google Scholar

[10] A. Brenna, F. Bolzoni, S. Beretta, M. Ormellese, Long-term chloride-induced corrosion monitoring of reinforced concrete coated with commercial polymer-modified mortar and polymeric coatings, Constr. Build. Mat. 48 (2013) 734–744.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.07.099

Google Scholar

[11] J. Bijen, Durability of engineering structures, Design, repair and maintenance, Woodhead Publishing Limited, Abington Hall, Cambridge (2000).

Google Scholar

[12] F. Pacheco-Torgal, S. Jalali, Toxicity of building materials, A key issue in sustainable construction. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, Taylor & Francis 4, (2011) 281-287.

DOI: 10.1080/19397038.2011.569583

Google Scholar

[13] F. Pacheco-Torgal, S. Jalali, A. Fucic, Toxicity of Building Materials, Woodhead Publishing Limited, Cambridge (2012).

DOI: 10.1533/9780857096357

Google Scholar

[14] F. Pacheco-Torgal, J.P. Castro-Gomes, S. Jalali, Adhesion characterization of tungsten mine waste geopolymeric binder. Influence of OPC concrete substrate surface treatment, Constr. Build. Mater. 22 (2008) 154-161.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.10.005

Google Scholar

[15] F. Pacheco-Torgal, J.A. Labrincha, C. Leonelli, A. Palomo, P. Chindaprasirt, Handbook of Alkali-Activated Cements, Mortars and Concretes ed., 1. Abington Hall, Cambridge, UK: WoodHead Publishing Limited- Elsevier Science and Technology (2014).

DOI: 10.1533/9781782422884.1

Google Scholar

[16] J. Provis, J.S.J. Van Deventer, Geopolymers: Structure, Processing, Properties and Industrial Applications, Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, UK (2009).

Google Scholar

[17] J. Provis, Geopolymers and other alkali activated materials: why, how, and what ? J. Mat. Struct. 47 (2014) 11-25.

DOI: 10.1617/s11527-013-0211-5

Google Scholar

[18] J.S.J. Van Deventer, J. Provis, P. Duxson, Technical and commercial progress in the adoption of geopolymer cement", Min. Eng. 29, (2012) 89-104.

DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2011.09.009

Google Scholar

[19] F. Pacheco-Torgal, J.P. Castro-Gomes, S. Jalali, Investigations on mix design of tungsten mine waste geopolymeric binders, Constr. Build. Mat. 22 (2008) 1939-(1949).

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.07.015

Google Scholar

[20] W.K. Lee, J.S.J. Van Deventer, The effect of ionic contaminants on the early-age properties of alcali-activated fly ash-based cements, Cem. Concr. Res. 32 (2002) 577-584.

DOI: 10.1016/s0008-8846(01)00724-4

Google Scholar

[21] R. Ferreira, Evaluation of durability test, Master Thesis, University of Minho, Guimaraes, Portugal (2000).

Google Scholar

[22] ERMCO – European ready-mixed concrete industry statistics – 2013 (2014).

Google Scholar

[23] F. Pacheco-Torgal, J.P. Castro-Gomes, Influence of physical and geometrical properties of granite and limestone aggregates on the durability of a C20/25 strength class concrete, Const. Build. Mat. 20 (2006) 1079-1088.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.01.063

Google Scholar

[24] A. Allahverdi, F. Škvára, Nitric acid attack on hardened paste of geopolymeric cements, Part 1, Ceram –Silik, 45 (2001) 81-88.

Google Scholar

[25] A. Allahverdi, F. Škvára, Nitric acid attack on hardened paste of geopolymeric cements, Part 2, Ceram –Silik, 45 (2001) 143-149.

Google Scholar

[26] A. Fernandez-Jimenez, I. Garcıa-Lodeiro, A. Palomo, Durability of alkali-activated fly ash cementitious materials, J. Mater. Sci. 42 (2007) 3055–3065.

DOI: 10.1007/s10853-006-0584-8

Google Scholar