Path Analysis of the Effect of Planting Hole Control Body on Salt Content in Seashore Saline Soil

Article Preview

Abstract:

Soil column experiments were conducted to study the effects of planting hole control body (PHCB) on the salt content using a hybrid uniformity design U12(12×43×34) on different soil condition (the groundwater mineralization, soil texture, the supplementary water). The planting hole control body (PHCB) was made of 4 kinds of components (local arbor, bagging material, filling material and its thickness, membrane material). For the components above and the soil condition, the method of path coefficient analysis was used to identify the major factors and to quantify the influencing degree. The results show that the supplementary water, soil texture, membrane material, local arbor, bagging material and filling material and its thickness were remarkably influential factors, and their path coefficients were statistically significant. The order of influence on the total salt content is local arbor, soil texture, membrane material, bagging material,filling material and its thickness, the supplementary water. The direct path coefficient of soil texture and local arbor display higher value, the former is 0.816, the latter is 0.994. Especialy, local arbor has less influence with small correlation coefficient (-0.027), which indicate that the interaction among various factors played a more important role. In a word, applying PHCB to reduce the salt concentration is an effective method.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 113-116)

Pages:

1545-1550

Citation:

Online since:

June 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2010 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Z. Shi, Y. Li, R. C. Wang, et al: Assessment of Temporal and Spatial Variability of Soil Salinity in a Coastal Saline Field. Environ. Geol. Vol. 48, No. 2 (2005), P. 171-178.

DOI: 10.1007/s00254-005-1285-3

Google Scholar

[2] Bowles, J. E: Engineering Properties of Soils and their Measurements. McGraw-Hill. New York. (1986).

Google Scholar

[3] Bowles, J. E: Foundation Analysis and Design. McGraw-Hill. New York (2002).

Google Scholar

[4] DiMaggio, F.L. and Sandler, I. S: Material Models for Granular Soils. Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division. ASCE, (1997), pp.935-950.

Google Scholar

[5] Review of Soil Mechanics Concepts and Analytical Techniques Used in Foundation Engineering, edited by Manjriker Gunaratne, volume 2 of Progress in The Foundation Engineering Handbook, chapter, 1, Taylor & Francis Group, LLC(2006).

DOI: 10.1201/9780203484418.ch1

Google Scholar

[6] Zhao Gengmao, Liu Zhaopu, Chen Mingda, et al: Study on Salinity Situation of Seashore Saline Soil Under Seawater Irrigation. Scientia Agricultura Sinica. Vol. 36, No. 6 (2003), pp.676-680.

Google Scholar

[7] Leina Zhang, Yong jun Feng, Hong Zhang: Study on the Influential Factors on Degree to Water and Salt Movement of Seashore Saline Soil. Journal of Shandong Agricultural University (Natural Science). Vol. 32, No. 1 (2001), pp.55-58.

Google Scholar

[8] Ren xiang Chen, Hui Dai: on the Conductometric Determination of Total Salt Content in Ground Water. P'I'CA (Part B: Chemical Analysis) Vol. 37, No. 10, (2001), pp.454-456.

Google Scholar

[9] Multiple Variance Analysis, in: Multivariate Statistical Analysis, edited by zhifa Yuan and Shide Song, chapter, 3, Science Press, Beijing (2009).

Google Scholar

[10] Path Analysis, in: Regressive Design and Multivariate Statistical Analysis, edited by Houyi Bai, chapter, 6, Guangxi Science &Technology Press (2003).

Google Scholar