Performance of a Refitted Anaerobic Reactor System in Treatment of Water Hyacinth Press Juice

Article Preview

Abstract:

The main objective of the present experimental investigation was to evaluate the performance of using a refitted anaerobic reactor system to treat the water hyacinth press juice. The biogas production rate was rapidly rising from 25 L.d-1 to 54 L.d-1 in the first few start-up days, there was approximately 1332 L biogas measured by wet gas meter and 62% of methane was detected during the experiment period. At the end of the anaerobic digestion treatment, it could be observed about 83.5% COD, 85.7% SS and 74.1% SS of the initial content was removed, declined from 7428 mg.L-1 to 1223 mg.L-1, from 6748 mg.L-1 to 967mg.L-1 and from 2315 mg.L-1 to 600mg.L-1, respectively. TN declined from 127.8mg.L-1 to 88.0mg.L-1 with a total loss of 31.2%. The variation of TP in the whole process was gradually declined, from 34.3mg.L-1 to 25.0mg.L-1, had total 27.1% lost. In the whole digestion process the pH increased slowly from 6.8 to 7.8. On the basis of the experimental results obtained, it is possible to conclude that: the refitted anaerobic reactor system for water hyacinth press juice digestion was practical and effective.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 113-116)

Pages:

504-507

Citation:

Online since:

June 2010

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2010 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] A. Malik: Environ. Int. Vol. 33 (2007), pp.122-138.

Google Scholar

[2] D. Mishima, M. Kuniki, K. Sei: Bioresour Technol. Vol. 99 (2008), pp.2495-2500.

Google Scholar

[3] K. Skinner, N. Wright, E. Porter-Goff: Environ. Pollution Vol. 145 (2007), pp.234-237.

Google Scholar

[4] J.C. Zheng, H.M. Feng, M.H.W. Lam, P.K.S. Lam, Y.W. Ding, H.Q. Yu: J. Hazardous Materials, in press (2009).

Google Scholar

[5] C.C. Gunnarsson, C.M. Petersen: Was. Manag. Vol. 27 (2007), pp.117-129.

Google Scholar

[6] J.R. Wilson, N. Holst, M. Rees: Aquatic Botany Vol. 81 (2005), pp.51-67.

Google Scholar

[7] J.A. Coetzee, M.J. Byrne, M.P. Hill: Aquatic Botany Vol. 86 (2007), pp.179-186.

Google Scholar

[8] W.P. Hu, J. Salomonsen, F.L. Xu, P.M. Pu: Ecolog. Model. Vol. 107 (1998), pp.171-188.

Google Scholar

[9] J.B. Lu, J.G. Wu, Z.H. Fu, L. Zhu: Environ. Manage. Vol. 40 No. 6 (2007), pp.823-830.

Google Scholar

[10] R.M. Kathiresan: Crop Protection Vol. 19 (2000), pp.705-708.

Google Scholar

[11] I. Ferrer, J. Palatsi, E. Campos, X. Flotats: Waste Manage. in press (2009).

Google Scholar

[12] B. Girisuta, B. Danon, R. Manurung, L.P.B.M. Janssen, H.J. Heeres: Bioresource Technology Doi: 10. 1016/j. biortech. 2008. 02. 045 (2008).

Google Scholar

[13] V.K. Verma, Y.P. Singh, J.P.N. Rai: Bioresource Technology Vol. 98 (2007), pp.1664-1669.

Google Scholar

[14] G. Lastella, C. Testa, G. Cornacchia, M. Notornicola, F. Voltasio, V.K. Sharma: Energy Convers. Manage. Vol. 43 (2002), pp.63-75.

DOI: 10.1016/s0196-8904(01)00011-5

Google Scholar

[15] Y.Z. Zhang, C. Y Qing, Y.N. Liu,W. L Li: Renewable energy, Vol. 117 No. 5 (2004), pp.44-45.

Google Scholar

[16] A. J. Ward, P. J. Hobbs, P. J. Holliman, D. Jones: Bioresour. Technol. Vol. 99 (2008), pp.7928-7940.

Google Scholar

[17] SEPA: China Environmental Science, Beijing, (2002), pp.102-276.

Google Scholar