The Removal Effect on Chironomus kiiensis larvae and Mutagenicity in Urban Water Source with Chlorine Dioxie

Article Preview

Abstract:

Chironomus kiiensis larvae which cannot be exterminated by conventional disinfection process propagates prolifically in eutrophic water body, and it therefore turns to be a potential problem encountered in drinking water quality. In order to tackle this problem, a pilot-scale study of removal effect on Chironomus kiiensis larvae with chlorine dioxide in a waterworks is performed. The experiment results showed that Chironomus kiiensis larvae can be effectively removed from water by 0.55 mg/L chlorine dioxide pre-oxidation combined with the conventional drinking water treatment process. Higher oxidizability and molecular state of chlorine dioxide in water is the key to the inactivation of Chironomus kiiensis larvae. The chlorite, disinfection by-products (DBPs) of chlorine dioxide, is stable at 0.217 mg/L, which is lower than that critical value of the WHO. Ames test revealed that the mutagenicity was reduced by chlorine dioxide with respect to prechlorine. The propagation of Chironomus kiiensis larvae can be inactivated effectively and safely by chlorine dioxide pre-oxidation.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 113-116)

Pages:

744-749

Citation:

Online since:

June 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2010 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] K. A. Michael. �ew strategies for the control of the parthenogenetic Chironomed, Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association, vol. 13, pp.189-192, (1997).

Google Scholar

[2] E. C. Bay. Chironomid (Diptera: Chironomidae) larval occurrence and transport in a municipal water system, Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association, vol 9, pp.275-284, (1993).

Google Scholar

[3] L. Zhou, J. S. Zhang, and P. Lei. The research trends of preventions of Chironomid larvae pollution in drinking water treatment, Water and Wastewater, vol. 29, pp.25-28, (2003).

Google Scholar

[4] J. H. M. Van Lieverloo, D. W. Bosboom, and G. L. Bakker. Sampling and quantifying invertebrates form drinking water distribution mains, Water Research, vol. 38, pp.1101-1112, (2004).

DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2003.11.021

Google Scholar

[5] X. B. Sun, F. Y. Cui, and J. S. Zhang. Inactivation of Chironomid larvae with chlorine dioxide, Journal of Hazardous Meterials, vol. 142, pp.348-353, (2007).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.08.030

Google Scholar

[6] J. Gibbona, and S. Laha. Water purification systems: a comparative analysis based on the occurrence of disinfection by-products, Environ. Pollu., vol. 106, pp.425-428, (1999).

DOI: 10.1016/s0269-7491(99)00097-4

Google Scholar

[7] J. W. Li, Z. Yu, and X. Cai. Trihalomethanes formation in water treated with chlorine dioxide, Wat Res, vol. 30, pp.2371-2376, (1996).

DOI: 10.1016/0043-1354(96)00146-7

Google Scholar

[8] N. Narkis. Disinfection of efficient by combinations of chlorine dioxide and chlorine, Wat Sci Technol, vol. 31, pp.105-114, (1995).

DOI: 10.2166/wst.1995.0574

Google Scholar

[9] E. M. Aieta and J. D. Berg. A view of chlorine dioxide in drinking water treatment, Journal of AWWA, vol. 78, pp.62-73, (1986).

Google Scholar

[10] World Health Organization, WHO Guidelines for Drinking Water Quality. Vol. 1. Geneva, Switzerland. (2004).

Google Scholar

[11] V. Langvik and B. Holmbom. Formation of mutagentic organic byproducts and AOX by chlorination of fractions of humic water, Water Research, vol. 28, pp.553-557, (1994).

DOI: 10.1016/0043-1354(94)90006-x

Google Scholar

[12] J. L. Huang and B. X. Li. Comparison of the mutagenicity of drinking water with chlorine dioxide and chlorine disinfections, Environment Chemistry, vol. 17, pp.34-38, (1998).

Google Scholar