Comparative Genomics Underlines the Functional and Taxonomic Diversity of Novel “Ferrovum” Related Iron Oxidizing Bacteria

Sophie R. Ullrich; Anja Poehlein; Rolf Daniel; Judith S. Tischler; Sarah Vogel; Michael Schlömann; Martin Mühling

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1130.15

Paper Titles

Foreword, Honouring Henry L. Ehrlich, Committees & Sponsors

New Insights into Salt-Tolerance in Acidophilic Iron-Oxidising Bacteria
p.3

Microbial Communities in Sediments in Acidic, Metal-Rich Mine Lakes: Results from a Study in South-West Spain
p.7

Influence of Different Growth Conditions on the Composition of Extracellular Polymeric Substances of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans and Acidithiobacillus ferrivorans Species
p.11

Comparative Genomics Underlines the Functional and Taxonomic Diversity of Novel “Ferrovum” Related Iron Oxidizing Bacteria
p.15

Screening and Isolation of Bacterial Strains with the Biotechnological Potential to Destruct Cyanide-Bearing Compounds under the Conditions of Extreme Continental Climate
p.19

Dyp-Type Peroxidase (DypA) from the Bioleaching Acidophilic Bacterium Leptospirillum ferriphilum DSM 14647
p.23

Global Transcriptional Responses of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans Wenelen under Different Sulfide Minerals
p.28

Comparison of Microbial and Geochemical Conditions of Lignite Coal Spoil and Overburden Areas and their Environmental Impact
p.32

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vol. 1130Comparative Genomics Underlines the Functional and...

Comparative Genomics Underlines the Functional and Taxonomic Diversity of Novel “Ferrovum” Related Iron Oxidizing Bacteria

Abstract:

Although acidophilic iron oxidizing bacteria related to “Ferrovum myxofaciens” P3G have been detected in various mining sites the knowledge about their physiology is limited to the type strain “F. myxofaciens” P3G. In order to further the knowledge on the metabolic capacity of “Ferrovum” related iron oxidizers we conducted a comparative genome analysis of three “Ferrovum” strains: JA12, PN-J185 and Z-31 (Z-31). The results of the phylogenetic analysis and the genome-to-genome distance calculation indicate that Z-31 belongs to a different “Ferrovum” species than JA12 and PN-J185. Comparative genome analyses revealed variations regarding the carbon, nitrogen and energy metabolism of the three strains which also corroborate the results concerning their phylogenetic relationship.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Biotechnologies in Mining Industry and Environmental Engineering

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volume 1130)

Pages:

15-18

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1130.15

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

November 2015

Authors:

Sophie R. Ullrich*, Anja Poehlein, Rolf Daniel, Judith S. Tischler, Sarah Vogel, Michael Schlömann, Martin Mühling

Keywords:

Acid Mine Drainage, Acidophilic Iron Oxidizing Bacteria, Comparative Genomics, Genome Analysis

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] D.B. Johnson, K.B. Hallberg and S. Hedrich: Appl. Environ. Microbiol. (2014) Vol. 80, p.672.

Google Scholar

[2] E. Heinzel, S. Hedrich, K.E. Janneck, F. Glombitza, J. Seifert and M. Schlömann: Appl. Environ. Microbiol. (2009) Vol. 75, p.858.

DOI: 10.1128/aem.01045-08

Google Scholar

[3] D.S. Jones, C. Kohl, C. Grettenberger, L.N. Larson, W.D. Burgos and J.L. Macalady: Appl. Environ. Microbiol. (2014) epub. ahead of print, 10. 1128/AEM. 02919-14.

Google Scholar

[4] S. Kimura, C.G. Bryan, K.B. Hallberg and D.B. Johnson: Environ. Microbiol. (2011) Vol. 13, p. (2092).

Google Scholar

[5] J.S. Tischler, R.J. Jwair, N. Gelhaar, A. Drechsel, A. Skirl, C. Wiacek, E. Janneck and M. Schlömann: J. Microbiol. Methods (2013) Vol. 95, p.138.

DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2013.07.027

Google Scholar

[6] S. Mosler, A. Poehlein, S. Voget, R. Daniel, J. Kipry, M. Schlömann and M. Mühling: AMR (2013) Vol. 825, p.153.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.825.153

Google Scholar

[7] S.R. Ullrich, A. Poehlein, S. Voget, M. Hoppert, R. Daniel, A. Leimbach, J.S. Tischler, M. Schlömann and M. Mühling: submitted to SIGS (2014).

DOI: 10.1186/s40793-015-0040-y

Google Scholar

[8] E. Pruesse, J. Peplies and F.O. Glöckner: Bioinformatics (2012) Vol. 28, p.1823.

Google Scholar

[9] K. Tamura, G. Stecher, D. Peterson, A. Filipski and S. Kumar: Mol. Biol. Evol. (2013) Vol. 30, p.2725.

Google Scholar

[10] J.P. Meier-Kolthoff, H. -P. Klenk and M. Göker: Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. (2014) Vol. 64, p.352.

Google Scholar

[11] A. Moya-Beltrán, J.P. Cárdenas, P.C. Covarrubias, F. Issotta, F.J. Ossandon, B.M. Grail, D.S. Holmes, R. Quatrini and D.B. Johnson: Genome Announc. (2014) Vol. 2, e00834-14.

DOI: 10.1128/genomea.00834-14

Google Scholar

[12] M. Kim, H. Oh, S. Park and J. Chun: Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. (2014) Vol. 64, p.346.

Google Scholar

[13] J. Valdés, I. Pedroso, R. Quatrini, R.J. Dodson, H. Tettelin, R. Blake, J.A. Eisen and D.S. Holmes: BMC Genomics (2008) Vol. 9, p.597.

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-597

Google Scholar