Bioleaching of Complex Refractory Gold Ore Concentrate of China: Comparison of Shake Flask and Continuous Bioreactor

Article Preview

Abstract:

The laboratory tests of biooxidation and cyanidation were carried out by using samples of the complex refractory gold ore from China. The elemental composition was 16.8 % iron, 18.6 % sulfur, 4.88 % arsenic,2.30 % carbon and 3.49 % antimony. Gold is assayed at 46 g/t. The arsenic oxidation of 88.11 %,carbon removal rate of 32.34 % and antimony oxidation of 23.92 % over 16d was achieved in shake flasks in the presence of the mixed culture (HQ0211: Thiobacillus ferrooxidans Leptospirillum ferrooxidans and Thiobacillus thiooxidans). The continuous bioreactor tests resulted in greater dissolution rates for arsenic, carbon and antimony, which led to a greater extent of sulphide oxidation within a shorter period of time. The maximum oxidation of arsenic and antimony was 90.72 % and 40.09 % respectively and the removal rate of carbon is 63.48% after 8d in the continuous bioreactor tests. After bioleaching, the gold recovery of the oxidation residue was 98.02 % with the cyanidation method, which was showed the biological pretreatment was applicable to the complex refractory gold ore.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

243-246

Citation:

Online since:

November 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] R.K. Amankwah, W. -T. Yen and J.A. Ramsay: Minerals Engineering (2005) Vol. 18, pp.103-104.

Google Scholar

[2] B. Nanthakumar, C.A. Pickles and S. Kelebek: Minerals Engineering (2007) Vol. 20, p.1110.

Google Scholar

[3] Yingbo Dong, Hai Lin, Xiaofang Xu and Shanshan Zhou: Hydrometallurgy (2013), doi: 10. 1016/j. hydromet. 2013. 05. 009.

Google Scholar

[4] H. Ciftci and A. Akcil: Minerals Engineering (2007) Vol. 46-47, pp.25-27.

Google Scholar

[5] Ramon Gonzalez, Juan C. Gentina and Fernando Acevedo: Biochemical Engineering Journal (2004) Vol. 19, p.33.

Google Scholar