Interactions between Chalcopyrite and Marmatite during Bioleaching Process

Article Preview

Abstract:

Chalcopyrite (CuFeS2) and marmatite [(Zn, Fe) S] are associated together most of the time in the raw ores and flotation concentrates. In this work, the interactions between chalcopyrite and marmatite during bioleaching by moderately thermophilic bacteria were investigated by electrochemical measurements and bioleaching experiments. In the initial stage of bioleaching of mixture of chalcopyrite and marmatite, the dissolution of marmatite was preferential, and was significantly accelerated with the addition of chalcopyrite because of the galvanic effect and catalytic effect of Cu2+ ions, while the dissolution of chalcopyrite was inhibited mainly due to the galvanic effect before the accomplishment of marmatite dissolution. Chalcopyrite dissolves fast when the dissolution of marmatite is finished, and small amount of marmatite cannot inhibit the final copper extraction of chalcopyrite if leaching time was long enough. Therefore, stepwise or selective bioleaching was feasible in processing mixture of chalcopyrite and marmatite to avoid complex flotation process in separating chalcopyrite and marmatite.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

259-262

Citation:

Online since:

November 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Y. Li, N. Kawashima, J. Li, A.P. Chandra, A.R. Gerson, A review of the structure, and fundamental mechanisms and kinetics of the leaching of chalcopyrite, Adv. Colloid. Interfac. 197-198 (2013) 1-32.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cis.2013.03.004

Google Scholar

[2] H. R Watling, The bioleaching of sulphide minerals with emphasis on copper sulphides—a review, Hydrometallurgy 84 (2006) 81-108.

DOI: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2006.05.001

Google Scholar

[3] S. Y Shi, Z. H Fang, Bioleaching of marmatite flotation concentrate by Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans, Hydrometallurgy 75 (2004) 1-10.

DOI: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2004.05.008

Google Scholar

[4] S. Shi, Z. Fang, Bioleaching of marmatite flotation concentrate by adapted mixed mesoacidophilic cultures in an air-lift reactor, Int. J. Miner. Process. 76 (2005) 3-12.

DOI: 10.1016/j.minpro.2004.05.005

Google Scholar

[5] J. R Ban, G. H Gu, K. T Hu, Bioleaching and electrochemical property of marmatite by Leptospirillum ferrooxidans, T. Nonferr. Metal. Soc. 23 (2013) 494-500.

DOI: 10.1016/s1003-6326(13)62490-5

Google Scholar

[6] R. Liu, W. Sun, Y. Hu, D. Wang, Surface chemical study of the selective separation of chalcopyrite and marmatite, Mining Science and Technology (China) 20 (2010) 542-545.

DOI: 10.1016/s1674-5264(09)60240-4

Google Scholar

[7] W. Qin, F. Jiao, W. Sun, M. He, H. Huang, Selective Flotation of Chalcopyrite and Marmatite by MBT and Electrochemical Analysis, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 51 (2012) 11538-11546.

DOI: 10.1021/ie300410f

Google Scholar

[8] W. Qin, F. Jiao, W. Sun, X. Wang, B. Liu, J. Wang, K. Zeng, Q. Wei, K. Liu, Effects of sodium salt of N, N-dimethyldi-thiocarbamate on floatability of chalcopyrite, sphalerite, marmatite and its adsorption properties, Colloid. Surf. A-Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 421 (2013).

DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2013.01.009

Google Scholar

[9] W. Zeng, G. Qiu, H. Zhou, J. Peng, M. Chen, S.N. Tan, W. Chao, X. Liu, Y. Zhang, Community structure and dynamics of the free and attached microorganisms during moderately thermophilic bioleaching of chalcopyrite concentrate, Bioresource. Technol. 101 (2010).

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.04.003

Google Scholar

[10] N. P Marhual, N. Pradhan, R.N. Kar, L.B. Sukla, B.K. Mishra. Differential bioleaching of copper by mesophilic and moderately thermophilic acidophilic consortium enriched from same copper mine water sample, Bioresource. Technol. 99 (2008).

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.03.003

Google Scholar

[11] K.Q. Jiang, Z.H. Guo, X.Y. Xiao, X.Y. Wei, Effect of moderately thermophilic bacteria on metal extraction and electrochemical characteristics for zinc smelting slag in bioleaching system, T. Nonferr. Metal. Soc. 22 (2012) 3120-3125.

DOI: 10.1016/s1003-6326(11)61580-x

Google Scholar

[12] H. Zhao, J. Wang, C. Yang, M. Hu, X. Gan, L. Tao, W. Qin, G. Qiu, Effect of redox potential on bioleaching of chalcopyrite by moderately thermophilic bacteria: An emphasis on solution compositions, Hydrometallurgy 151 (2015) 141-150.

DOI: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2014.11.009

Google Scholar

[13] S. Y Shi, Z.H. Fang, J.R. Ni, Electrochemistry of marmatite–carbon paste electrode in the presence of bacterial strains, Bioelectrochemistry 68 (2006) 113-118.

DOI: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2005.05.006

Google Scholar

[14] J. Liu, S. Wen, X. Chen, S. Bai, D. Liu, Q. Cao, DFT computation of Cu adsorption on the S atoms of sphalerite (110) surface, Miner. Eng. 46 (2013) 1-5.

DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2013.03.026

Google Scholar

[15] S.H. Yin, A.X. Wu, G.Z. Qiu, Bioleaching of low-grade copper sulphides, T. Nonferr. Metal. Soc. 18 (2008) 707-713.

Google Scholar

[16] L. Quan, Electrochemical flotation separation of marmatite from pyrrhotite in the presence of copper ion, T. Nonferr. Metal. Soc. 10 (2000) 90-92.

Google Scholar