Bioleaching of Copper Sulphide Ore by a Microbial Consortium Isolated from Acid Mine Drainage: Influence of [Fe2+]

Article Preview

Abstract:

Peru is mining country with a great diversity of mineral resource. The high grade ores are declining, and there is a need to implement new techniques for recycling metals (Cu, Au, Zn, Pb, etc) from low-grade ores. In order to answer this question, the bioleaching of copper from sulphide ore (FeS2 45.30%, CuFeS2 1.90%, ZnS 8.90%, FeAsS 13.12%, PbS 3.69%) was evaluated with different concentrations of Fe2+ using an iron-oxidizing native microbial consortium.The samples were collected from drainage acid mine (4100 m.a.s.l.) located in the south of Huancavelica region and the sample of ore from middle Huaraz region (3200 m.a.s.l.). Microorganisms were isolated in 9k medium at pH 1.8, 22oC. Bioleaching test were performed in two consecutive steps to 150 rpm at 22oC, monitoring pH, ORP (mV). Assays varying the concentration of Fe2+ (0 mM – 53 mM) were performed with a pulp density of 1% and 2% at each step, and with an inoculum 10% (v/v) to a microbial concentration of 108 cel/mL.We isolated a microbial consortium after 8 weeks with presence of bacteria Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans-like. In assays, copper was solubilized. The microbial concentration in the tests was (2x107- 4x107cel/mL). In the first stage, the test with 21 mM Fe2+ recovered 62% copper. In the next step, with the bacterial concentration of the first step, bioleaching time is reduced by 22% for copper recovery (63%) in absence of Fe2+.With these data, we observed that the addition of iron is not necessary in a stage adaptation when the mineral contain iron.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

418-422

Citation:

Online since:

November 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] M. Vera, A. Schippers and W. Sand. Progress in bioleaching: fundamentals and mechanisms of bacterial metal sulfide oxidation—part A. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 97(17) (2013) 7529.

DOI: 10.1007/s00253-013-4954-2

Google Scholar

[2] C.L. Brierley. How will biomining be applied in future? Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China. 18 (2008) 1302.

Google Scholar

[3] MINEM. Boletin minero. MINEM, Lima, (2011).

Google Scholar

[4] D.E. Rawlings and D.B. Johnson. The microbiology of biomining: development and optimization of mineral-oxidizing microbial consortia. Microbiology. 153 (2007) 315-324.

DOI: 10.1099/mic.0.2006/001206-0

Google Scholar

[5] S. Wang, G. Zhang, Q. Yuan, Z. Fang and C. Yang. Comparative study of external addition of Fe2+ and inoculum on bioleaching of marmatite flotation concentrate using mesophilic and moderate thermophilic bacteria Hydrometallurgy 93 (2008) 51-56.

DOI: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2008.02.019

Google Scholar

[6] P. S. Pina, V. A. Leao, C. A. Silva, D. Daman and J. Frenay. The effect of ferrous and ferric iron on sphalerite bioleaching with Acidithiobacillus sp. Minerals Engineering. 18 (2005) 549-551.

DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2004.08.011

Google Scholar

[7] H. Chen, B. Yang and X. Chen. Identification and characterization of four strains of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans isolated from different sites in China. Microbiological Research. 164(6) (2009) 613-623.

DOI: 10.1016/j.micres.2007.09.002

Google Scholar

[8] E.M. Córdova, J.A. Muñoz, M.L. Blázquez, F. González and A. Ballester. Passivation of chalcopyrite during its chemical leaching with ferric ion at 68°C. Minerals Engineering 22 (2009) 229-235.

DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2008.07.004

Google Scholar

[9] E. M. Córdova, J.A. Muñoz, M.L. Blázquez, F. González and A. Ballester. Leaching of chalcopyrite with ferric ion. Part IV: The role of redox potential in the presence of mesophilic and thermophilic bacteria. Hydrometallurgy 93 (2008) 106-115.

DOI: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2007.11.005

Google Scholar