Advances in Evaluation of Surfactant Performances at High Temperature by Static Foam Tests

Abstract:

—Foam stability and mobility reduction are the key parameters for foam assisted enhanced oil recovery. The harsh conditions such as high temperature, pressure and salinity present in an oil reservoir tend to destabilise the foam leading to poor sweep efficiency. Screening for the best performing foaming recipes has been performed to ascertain foam stability in the presence and absence of oil. Static foam test has been performed in order to study the foam stability and foam oil interactions at 90°C. Two anionic surfactants, alpha olefin sulphonate (AOS_14-16) and methyl ester sulphonate (MES_16-18) were mixed with betaine (foam booster) in different proportions to design the formulations. In addition to the ternary formulations, binary formulation involving surfactant and betaine were also evaluated for foam stability. For the study of oil effects on foaming performance of surfactant formulation, n-decane, diesel and Dulang crude oil are used. The recipes were evaluated by static foam tests to note the foam height and endurance time. It was found that the anionic surfactant played a major role in foam stability and the betaine was found less significant. However, the betaine alone was found effective for foaming and was poor for endurance time. While in mixture, the surfactant and betaine were found to interact strongly and a profound synergistic effect was noted. During oil interaction studies, the alkane type oils of low molecular weight become solubilised with surfactant molecule forming an emulsion and hence decimate the foam stability. However, higher alkanes with molecular chain more than ten carbon atoms (decane) stabilised the foam because of low solubilisation efficiency between surfactant and oil to form emulsions. The obtained results of the designed experiment have been analysed and discussed in detail to understand the contribution of individual component as well as their interactions with each other in order to stabilize foams.Keywords—Static Foam, Foam-Oil interactions, AOS, MES, Enhanced Oil Recovery

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volume 1133)
• Pages: 634-638
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1133.634
• Online since: January 2016
• Authors: Mudassar Mumtaz*, Isa Mohd Tan, Muhammad Mushtaq, Muhammad Sagir
• Keywords: AOS, Enhanced Oil Recovery, Foam-Oil Interactions, MES, Static Foam

References

[1] J. A. Boon, Chemistry in Enhanced Oil Recovery- Overview (1984).

[2] M. Sagir, Tan, Isa M, Mushtaq Muhammad, Talebian, Seyedeh Hosna, FAWAG Using CO2 Philic Surfactants for CO2 Mobility Control for Enhanced Oil Recovery Applications, SPE-172189-MS.

DOI: 10.2118/172189-ms

[3] M. Mushtaq, I. M. Tan, L. Ismail, S. Y. C. Lee, M. Nadeem, M. Sagir, Oleate ester-derived nonionic surfactants: synthesis and cloud point behavior studies, Journal of Dispersion Science and Technology. 35 (2014) 322-328.

DOI: 10.1080/01932691.2013.783492

[4] R. F. Fejoli, O. J. Romero, Critical concentration of foam and enhanced oil recovery, presented at the SPE heavy and extra heavy oil conference: Latin America, Medellín, Colombia, (2014).

DOI: 10.2118/171058-ms

[5] S. A. Farzaneh, M. Sohrabi, A review of the status of foam application in enhanced oil recovery, presented at EAGE Annual Conference & Exhibition SPE Europec, London, UK, (2013).

DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.20130508

[6] E. O. Egbogah, Research Into Enhanced Oil Recovery Technologies (1985).

[7] P. H. Doe, B. S. Carey, E. S. Helmuth, The 1984 Natl. Petroleum Council Study on EOR: Chemical Processes (1987).

DOI: 10.2118/13240-pa

[8] J. K. Borchardt, Foaming Agents for EOR: Correlation of Surfactant Performance Properties with Chemical Structure, presented at the SPE International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry San Antonio, Texas, USA, (1987).

DOI: 10.2118/16279-ms

[9] R. M. Sunmonu, M. Onyekonwu, Enhanced Oil Recovery using Foam Injection; a Mechanistic Approach, presented at the SPE Nigeria Annual International Conference and Exhibition, Lagos, Nigeria, (2013).

DOI: 10.2118/167589-ms

[10] S. A. Farzaneh, M. Sohrabi, Experimental investigation of CO2-foam stability improvement by alkaline in the presence of crude oil, Chemical Engineering Research and Design. 94 (2) (2015) 375-389.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cherd.2014.08.011

[11] R. Farajzadeh, A. Andrianov, R. Krastev, G. J. Hirasaki, W. R. Rossen, Foam–oil interaction in porous media: Implications for foam assisted enhanced oil recovery, Advances in Colloid and Interface Science. 183–184 (2012) 1-13.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cis.2012.07.002

[12] M. Han, A. AlSofi, A. Fuseni, X. Zhou, S. Hassan, Development of chemical EOR formulations for a high temperature and high salinity carbonate reservoir, presented at the International Petroleum Technology Conference, Beijing, China, (2013).

DOI: 10.2523/17084-ms

[13] J. J. Novosad, K. Mannhardt, The Interaction between Foam and Crude Oils, presented at the Annual Technical Meeting, Banff, (1989).

DOI: 10.2118/89-40-29

[14] A. K. Vikingstad, A. Skauge, H. Høiland, M. Aarra, Foam–oil interactions analyzed by static foam tests, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 260(2005)189-198.

DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2005.02.034

[15] M. Simjoo and P. L. J. Zitha, Effects of Oil on Foam Generation and Propagation in Porous Media, presented at the SPE Enhanced Oil Recovery Conference, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, (2013).

DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.20142596