A Novel Soil Moisture Predicting Method Based on Artificial Neural Network and Xinanjiang Model

Article Preview

Abstract:

Soil moisture plays an important role in agricultural drought predicting, therefore there is an increasing demand for detailed predictions of soil moisture, especially at basin scales. However, so far soil moisture predictions are usually obtained as a by-product of climate and weather prediction models coupled with a land surface parameterization scheme, and there has been little dedicated work to meet this urgent need at basin scales. In order to improve the basin hydrological models’ performance in the soil moisture forecasting, an integrated soil moisture predicting model based on Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Xinanjiang model is proposed and presented in this paper. The performance of the new integrated soil moisture predicting model was tested in the Linyi watershed with a drainage area of 10040 km2, located in the semi-arid area of the eastern China. The results suggest that the soil moisture simulated by the integrated ANN-Xinanjiang model is more agree with the observed ones than that simulated by Xinanjiang, and that the simulated soil moisture by both the models has the similar trend and temporal change pattern with the observed one.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 121-122)

Pages:

1028-1032

Citation:

Online since:

June 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2010 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] D. D. Ren, M. Xue, and A. Henderson-Sellers, Incorporating hydraulic lift into a land surface model and its effects on surface soil moisture prediction, Journal of Hydrometeorology, vol. 5(2004), pp.1181-1191.

DOI: 10.1175/jhm-385.1

Google Scholar

[2] J. D. Kalma and G. Boulet, Measurement and prediction of soil moisture in a medium-sized catchment, Hydrological Sciences Journal-Journal Des Sciences Hydrologiques, vol. 43(1998), pp.597-610.

DOI: 10.1080/02626669809492156

Google Scholar

[3] Y. Shao, L. M. Leslie, R. K. Munro, P. Irannejad, W. F. Lyons, R. Morison, D. Short, and M. S. Wood, Soil moisture prediction over the Australian continent, Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics, vol. 63(1997), pp.195-215.

DOI: 10.1007/bf01027385

Google Scholar

[4] Z. L. Hu and S. Islam, Prediction of Ground Surface-Temperature and Soil-Moisture Content by the Force-Restore Method, Water Resources Research, vol. 31(1995), pp.2531-2539.

DOI: 10.1029/95wr01650

Google Scholar

[5] K. J. Beven and M. J. Kirkby, A physically based variable contributing area model of basin hydrology, Hydrological Science Bulletin, vol. 43(1979), pp.43-69.

DOI: 10.1080/02626667909491834

Google Scholar

[6] R. J. Zhao, The Xinanjiang Model, in Hydrological Forecasting Proceedings Oxford Symposium, IASH, Oxford(1980), pp.351-356.

Google Scholar

[7] R. J. Zhao, The Xinanjiang Model Applied in China, Journal of Hydrology, vol. 135(1992), pp.371-381.

Google Scholar

[8] T. Y. Gan, E. M. Dlamini, and G. F. Biftu, Effects of model complexity and structure, data quality, and objective functions on hydrologic modeling, Journal of Hydrology, vol. 192(1997), pp.81-103.

DOI: 10.1016/s0022-1694(96)03114-9

Google Scholar

[9] L. L. Ren, Q. Huang, F. Yuan, J. X. Wang, J. Xu, Z. B. Yu, and X. R. Liu, Evaluation of the Xinanjiang model structure by observed discharge and gauged soil moisture data in the HUBEX/GAME Project, Predictions in Ungauged Basins: Promise and Progress, vol. 303(2006).

Google Scholar

[10] J. XU, J. ZHAO, W. ZHANG, Z. HU, and Z. Zheng, Mid-short-term daily runoff forecasting by anns and multiple process-based hydrological models., in Proc. - IEEE Youth Conf. Inf., Comput. Telecommun., YC-ICT, 2009, pp.526-529.

DOI: 10.1109/ycict.2009.5382440

Google Scholar

[11] J. XU, X. ZHU, W. ZHANG, X. XU, and J. XIAN, Daily streamflow forecasting by artificial neural network in a large-scale basin, in Proc. - IEEE Youth Conf. Inf., Comput. Telecommun., YC-ICT, 2009, pp.487-490.

DOI: 10.1109/ycict.2009.5382453

Google Scholar

[12] P. Srivastava, J. N. McVair, and T. E. Johnson, Comparison of process-based and artificial neural network approaches for streamflow modeling in an agricultural watershed, Journal of the American Water Resources Association, vol. 42(2006).

DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2006.tb04475.x

Google Scholar

[13] M. C. Demirel, A. Venancio, and E. Kahya, Flow forecast by SWAT model and ANN in Pracana basin, Portugal, Advances in Engineering Software, vol. 40(2006), pp.467-473.

DOI: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2008.08.002

Google Scholar

[14] L. Zhi-jia, Y. Cheng, and K. Xiang-guang, THE IMPROVED XINANJIANG MODEL, Journal of Hydrodynamics,Ser.B, vol. 17(2005), pp.746-751.

Google Scholar