Research on Evaluation of Economics of Product Quality Based on Fuzzy Theory

Article Preview

Abstract:

As the consumptive concept increasingly matured, the product quality and the economics of quality has been an important aspect in the economical development. The paper laid emphasis on the research of comprehensive evaluation of economics of quality. It established the evaluation index system that can effectively indicate the conditions of economics of quality, measured the economics of quality comprehensively and quantitatively. A fuzzy evaluation model which can quantitatively evaluate the economics of quality was also built up. The feasibility and effectiveness of the model was also proved by a material example.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 121-122)

Pages:

314-319

Citation:

Online since:

June 2010

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2010 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Shailesh Kulkarni and Victor Prybutok: Stochastics and Statistics Process Investment and Loss Functions: Models and Analysis, European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 1, 2004, pp.120-129.

DOI: 10.1016/s0377-2217(03)00147-4

Google Scholar

[2] Lynne Caughlan and Karen L. Oakley: Cost Considerations for Long-term Ecological Monitoring, Ecological Indicators, vol. 1, 2001, pp.123-134.

DOI: 10.1016/s1470-160x(01)00015-2

Google Scholar

[3] Ruth.M. Stock: Exploring the Conditions Under Which Salesperson Work Satisfaction Can Lead to Customer Satisfaction, Psychology & Marketing, vol. 5, 2005, pp.393-420.

DOI: 10.1002/mar.20065

Google Scholar

[4] Qi Xiao-ping: Research on Measurement Methods of Consumer Satisfaction Degree, Aeronautic Standardization & Quality, vol. 5, 2005, pp.11-15.

Google Scholar

[5] Philips L.W., Chang D.R. and Buzzell R.D.: Product Quality, Cost Position and Business Performance: A Test of Some Key Hypotheses, Journal of Marketing, vol. 47, 1983, pp.26-42.

DOI: 10.2307/1251491

Google Scholar