Laboratory Comparison of Mini-Discs with Point-Attack Picks

Bulent Tiryaki; Ian D. Gipps; Xing Sheng Li

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.126-128.189

Paper Titles

A Study on the Spiral Polishing of the Inner Wall of Stainless Bores
p.165

Modeling Surface Roughness and Hardness of Grinding SKD11 Steel Using Adaptive Network Based Fuzzy Inference
p.171

Surface Texture Analysis of Fixed and Free Abrasive Machining of Silicon Substrates for Solar Cells
p.177

Influences of Characteristics of Large Particle on the ‘Trap’ Effect of Semi-Fixed Abrasive Tool
p.181

Laboratory Comparison of Mini-Discs with Point-Attack Picks
p.189

Tool Wear Mechanism in Continuous Cutting of Difficult-to-Cut Material under Dry Machining
p.195

On Geometrical Errors and their Suppression in Turning Operation by Controlling Thrust Forces
p.202

Optimal Improvement on Cutting Yield Rate in ACF Attach Process of TFT-LCD Module Using Response Surface Method
p.208

Study on Tool Life by Breakage in Micro Endmilling
p.214

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vols. 126-128Laboratory Comparison of Mini-Discs with...

Laboratory Comparison of Mini-Discs with Point-Attack Picks

Abstract:

The selection of the cutter type is of crucial importance to maximise the advantages of mechanical rock excavation systems. Specific energy (SE), cutter forces, and rock properties are used to decide what type of cutter is most suitable for economical excavation of the rock based on laboratory rock cutting tests. This study is concerned with the preliminary results of an ongoing rock cutting program in which a mini-disc has been compared with a point-attack pick in laboratory linear cutting tests simulating a cutterhead on a Helidon sandstone block. Analysis of the preliminary results has shown that the mini-disc experienced lower mean cutting forces and was seven times more efficient than the pick in first layer cuts. However, the mini-disc had mean normal forces 1.5 times higher than the pick. Additionally, first layer cuts taken on the trimmed surfaces required more forces and SE than completely relieved cuts in pick cutting.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 126-128)

Pages:

189-194

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.126-128.189

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

August 2010

Authors:

Bulent Tiryaki, Ian D. Gipps, Xing Sheng Li

Keywords:

Cutterhead Simulation, Mini-Disc, Point-Attack Pick, Rock Cutting, Specific Energy

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] L. Ozdemir: No-Dig Engineering, Trenchless Technology Vol. 2 (1) (1995), p.18.

Google Scholar

[2] M.C. Hood and F.F. Roxborough, in: Rock Breakage: Mechanical, edited by H.L. Hartman (Senior Editor) in Mining Engineering Handbook, Second Edition, Vol. 1, SME (1992).

Google Scholar

[3] L. Ozdemir: Principles of Mechanical Rock Boring: Mechanical Excavation Techniques in Underground Construction, Short Course Notebook Vol. 1, ITU Istanbul (1992).

Google Scholar

[4] M.C. Hood, in: 2004 CRCMining Research and Effective Technology Transfer Conference, edited by H. Gurgenci, A. Hall, D. Howarth, P. Lever, T. Meyer and E. Nebot (2004).

Google Scholar

[5] I. Evans, in: Advances in Rock Mechanics, 3rd Congress of ISRM, edited by ISRM (1974).

Google Scholar

[6] R.A. Snowdon, M.D. Ryley and J. Temporal: Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. & Geomech. Abstr. Vol. 19 (1982).

Google Scholar