Optimal Parameter Design in Flip Chip Micro-Machining Process for Solder Residue by Using Design of Experiments Approach

Article Preview

Abstract:

Since the solder residue is essential in the semiconductor manufacturing process, it has great impact on the flip chip quality considerably. This paper intends to improve the flip chip quality and try to obtain an optimal solution for the system parameters in the flip chip manufacturing process. The SMT manufacturing process is studied for discussion. The amount of solder and the size of solder are selected as the two quality properties. During the flux cleaning process, many solders are left on the passive component side. The balling might flow into the chip. It will cause the bump short in the chip which will affect the quality of the flip chip severely. In this paper, response surface method is adopted as the design of experiments. The objective function and subjective constrained conditions are defined to formulate the optimization problem. The confirmation experimental results are also provided to prove the validity. It is believed that the optimization results are helpful to the improvement of the semiconductor manufacturing process.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 126-128)

Pages:

867-872

Citation:

Online since:

August 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2010 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] John H. Lau Express packaging system, Low cost Flip Chip technologies for DCA, WLSP and PBGA assemblies, (2002).

Google Scholar

[2] John H. Lau Express packaging system. Inc, Solder joint reliability BGA, CSP, Flip Chip and fine pitch SMT assemblies, (2002).

Google Scholar

[3] Ning-Cheng Lee, Reflow soldering process and troubleshooting: SMT, BGA, CSP and Flip Chip Technologies, (2001).

DOI: 10.1108/mi.2003.21820aae.003

Google Scholar

[4] Leandro G. Barajas, Process Control in High-Noise Environments Using a Limited Number of Measurements,School of Electrical and Computer Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta GA, 30332, (2002).

DOI: 10.17775/cseejpes.2016.00043

Google Scholar

[5] T. A. Nguty, N. N. Ekere, and A. Adebayo, 1999, Correlating Solder Paste Composition with Stencil Printing Performance , Electronics Manufacturing Engineering Research Group Department of Aeronautical, Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering University of Salford, (1999).

DOI: 10.1109/iemt.1999.804837

Google Scholar

[6] John H. Lau, Express packaging system, Low cost Flip Chip technologies for DCA, WLSP and PBGA assemblies, 2000. Table 2 Combinational array in response surface method Pad type Opening shape Opening gap Powder size Quantity Size.

Google Scholar

[1] 0 0 0. 3 25 39 150.

Google Scholar

[2] 0 -1 0. 375 45 29 100.

Google Scholar

[3] 1 1 0. 375 35 31 100.

Google Scholar

[4] 0 1 0. 375 45 29 100.

Google Scholar

[5] 1 0 0. 375 25 34 125.

Google Scholar

[6] 0 1 0. 45 35 22 50.

Google Scholar

[7] -1 1 0. 375 35 32 100.

Google Scholar

[8] 0 0 0. 3 45 31 100.

Google Scholar

[9] 0 0 0. 375 35 24 75.

Google Scholar

[10] 0 0 0. 375 35 24 75.

Google Scholar

[11] 1 0 0. 3 35 32 100.

Google Scholar

[12] -1 0 0. 375 45 24 75.

Google Scholar

[13] 0 -1 0. 3 35 36 125.

Google Scholar

[14] -1 0 0. 375 25 32 100.

Google Scholar

[15] -1 0 0. 3 35 39 150.

Google Scholar

[16] 0 0 0. 45 25 22 50.

Google Scholar

[17] 0 -1 0. 45 35 19 50.

Google Scholar

[18] 1 0 0. 375 45 26 75.

Google Scholar

[19] 0 1 0. 3 35 37 125.

Google Scholar

[20] 0 0 0. 45 45 14 25.

Google Scholar

[21] 1 -1 0. 375 35 31 100.

Google Scholar

[22] 1 0 0. 45 35 15 25.

Google Scholar

[23] -1 0 0. 45 35 14 25.

Google Scholar

[24] -1 -1 0. 375 35 29 100.

Google Scholar

[25] 0 0 0. 375 35 24 75.

Google Scholar

[26] 0 1 0. 375 25 41 150.

Google Scholar

[27] 0 -1 0. 375 25 37 125 Table 3 Confirmation experiments Pad type Opening shape Opening gap Powder size Solder residue Rework quantity Samples quantity IT U 0. 35mm 45µm 3 404 70520 IT U 0. 4mm 45µm 0 158 39594 IT U 0. 45mm 45µm 0 1163 114798.

Google Scholar