A Study on the Effects of Heat Treatment to the High-Carbon HSS Roll

Article Preview

Abstract:

High-carbon high-speed steels (HSS) are extremely abrasion resistant materials due to their high hardness MC type carbide and high hardness martensitic matrix. Different microstructures and mechanical behaviours were obtained after the quenching and tempering temperatures of HSS roll were changed. With air cooling and sodium silicate quenching, when the austenitizing temperature reaches 1273K, the metal matrix all transforms into the martensite, Afterwards, the eutectic carbides dissolve ceaselessly into the metal matrix and its continuous network distribution changes into broken network. The peak hardness temperature of high-carbon HSS is around 1323K, and the second hardening temperature is around 793K. No significant change in tensile strength and elongation percentage was observed unless the tempering temperature is beyond 753K. The tensile strength is increased obviously and the elongation percentage is decreased slightly beyond 753K. However, the tensile strength is decreased and the elongation percentage is increased when the temp exceeds 813K. The high-carbon HSS roll presents excellent abrasion resistance at 793K-813K.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 129-131)

Pages:

500-505

Citation:

Online since:

August 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2010 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Andersson M, Finnstrom R and Nylen T. Ironmaking and Steelmaking, 2004, 31(5): 383-388.

Google Scholar

[2] Kim C K, Par J Il, Lee S, et al. Metallurgical and Materials Trans A, 2005, A 36(1): 87-97.

Google Scholar

[3] Ichino K, Kataoka Y and Koseki T. Kawasaki Steel Technical Report, 1997, (37): 13-18.

Google Scholar

[4] Gong Kailing, Dong Yajun and Gao Chunli. Iron and Steel (Peking), 1998, 33(3): 67-71.

Google Scholar

[5] Shimizu M, Shitamura O, Matsuo S, et al. ISIJ Inter., 1992, 32(11): 1244-1249.

Google Scholar

[6] Hashimoto M, Otomo S and Yoshida K. ISIJ International, 1992, 32(11): 1202-1210.

Google Scholar

[7] Tanaka T,. In: Mechanical Working and Steel Process Conf Proceedings. 1998, 35: 435-444.

Google Scholar

[8] Ikawa Y, Itami T, Kumagai K, Kawashima Y, et al. ISIJ Inter., 1990, 30(9): 756-763.

Google Scholar

[9] Zhou C D, Fan J F, et al. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (Eng Letters), 2004, 17(4): 548-553.

Google Scholar

[10] Fu H, Zhao A and Xing J. Journal of Univ. Sci. Technology Beijing, 2003, 10(6): 61-66.

Google Scholar

[11] Xin Z and Perks M C. In: 42nd Mechanical Working and Steel Processing Conf Proceedings. 2000, 38: 183-191.

Google Scholar

[12] Xu Liujie, Xing Jiandong, et al. J of Xi'an Jiaotong Univ, 2006, 40(3): 275-278.

Google Scholar

[13] Wei Shizhong, Zhu Jinhua and Xu Liujie. Tribology International, 2006, 39(7): 641-648.

Google Scholar

[14] Zhou Hong, Wang Jinguo, Su Yuande, et al. Iron and Steel (Peking), 2000, 35(1): 47-50.

Google Scholar

[15] Zhao Yuechao and Xu Rui. Journal of Liaoning Technical University, 2003, 22(6): 836-838.

Google Scholar

[16] Tuo Jinhong, Chen Suiyuan, et al. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2006, 31(1): 56-59.

Google Scholar

[17] ASTM E-8: Annual book of ASTM standards, vol. 03. 01, 1998: 545-557.

Google Scholar

[18] Fu Hanguang and Jiang Zhiqiang. Acta Metallurgica Sinica, 2006, 42(5): 545-548.

Google Scholar

[19] Dobrzanski L A, et al. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2001, 109(1): 52-64.

Google Scholar