Seismic Risk Mitigation of Historical Masonry Towers by Means of Prestressing Devices

Article Preview

Abstract:

This work presents the investigation of the efficiency of different prestressing devices as a rehabilitation measure for the seismic risk mitigation of historical masonry towers. As a first phase, the seismic vulnerability of theoretical masonry towers was assessed by means of numerical models validated with information from the literature, observed damage and behavior of these structures due to passed earthquakes (crack pattern and failure mechanisms), and mainly taking into account the engineering experience. Afterwards, the validated models were rehabilitated with different prestressing devices; analyzing the results and concluding which device or the combination of them improved in a better way the seismic performance of the masonry towers. Finally, the methodology will be applied in two historical masonry towers located in seismic areas; the medieval tower “Torre Grossa” of San Gimignano, Italy, and one of the bell towers of the Cathedral of Colima, Mexico.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 133-134)

Pages:

843-848

Citation:

Online since:

October 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2010 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Bachmann, H, et al. (1997). Vibration problems in structures: Practical Guidelines.

Google Scholar

[2] Bayraktar, A, et al. (2009). Modal parameter identification of Hagia Sophia Bell-Tower via ambient vibration test., Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation , 28, 37-47.

DOI: 10.1007/s10921-009-0045-9

Google Scholar

[3] Calderini, C, and Lagomarsino, S (2004). A constitutive model for masonry: Formulation and implementation for the analysis of complex structures., University of Genoa, Italy.

Google Scholar

[4] Casolo, S (1998). A three-dimensional model for the vulnerability analysis of a slender medieval masonry tower., Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2(4), 487-512.

DOI: 10.1080/13632469809350332

Google Scholar

[5] Gambarotta, L, and Lagomarsino, S (1997). Damage models for the seismic response of brick masonry shear walls., Earthquake Eng. and Structural Mechanics, 26, 441-462.

DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9845(199704)26:4<441::aid-eqe651>3.0.co;2-0

Google Scholar

[6] GNDT (1990). Seismic Risk of Public Buildings., Italy.

Google Scholar

[7] Grünthal, G (1998). European Macroseismic Scale, Volume 15, Luxembourg.

Google Scholar

[8] Ivorra, S, et al. (2008). Experimental and numerical studies on the belltower of Santa Justa y Rufina (Orihuela-Spain), " in Proc. SAHC, 08, paper CH29, 349-355.

DOI: 10.1201/9781439828229.ch39

Google Scholar

[9] Lang, K (2002). Seismic vulnerability of existing buildings., Doctoral Thesis. ETH, Zurich.

Google Scholar

[10] NCSE (2002). Spanish Seismoresistant Construction Norm., Spanish standard.

Google Scholar